SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 758

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
LALITKUMAR SHAMARAM PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. DINKER S MISHRA(17567) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being CR No.11210067250076 of 2025 registered with Saroli Police Station, District Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 490, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and the applicant has been falsely enroped in the offence in the capacity of merchant however, infact he is working with accused No.2 who is the owner of the firm namely Radhe Creation and even the GST number and ownership of the proprietorship firm belongs to accused No.2 and accused Nos.1 and 2 had purchased goods worth Rs.28,10,390/- from the complainant and after returning the defective goods worth of Rs.2,89,086/-, Rs.25,21,304/- is yet to be paid by the accused persons. However, the applicant has nothing to do with the said transaction and even

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top