SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 370

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DINESHBHAI TRIBHUVANBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SAURABH J MEHTA(2170) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.) 

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11196007250086 of 2025 registered with Gorwa Police Station, Vadodara for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(4) and 54 of the BNS.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant is falsely implicated in the offence. Dispute is civil in nature. Upon instructions, learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that applicant has received an amount of Rs.15,35,000/- and he is ready to repay the same and to show his bona fide, he has filed an undertaking. It is submitted that without prejudice to his rights and contentions, applicant is ready and willing to deposit the same and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top