SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 835

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
ASAL AMRAT VAKTABHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR.KIRIT R CHAUDHARI(3745) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the respondent No.2 remained absent.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 /under Section 482 of the BNSS, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11216008250014 /2025 registered with Gandhinagar Sector-7 Police Station, Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Section 69 of BNS.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely enroped in the offence. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the alleged incident took place from March-2023 to August-2024 and from September, 2024 to December, 2024, but the complaint was filed belatedly and no explanation is given for the delay. Victim is major and the applicant is serving in SRPF, on the fateful day, he was not present at the spot and he has not committed any offence. It is alleged that present applicant is friendship relationship with her since long and this is the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top