SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 101

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAM PUNDLIK JADHAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SALMAN H BASRAI(12586) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. application for anticipatory bail (Para 1)
2. applicant's defense against allegations (Para 2)
3. opposition to anticipatory bail (Para 3)
4. judicious exercise of discretion (Para 4)
5. grant of anticipatory bail (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant falsely enroped in the offence in the pretext of having relationship with his earlier wife. The applicant used to talk to his earlier wife and due to this, the deceased has committed suicide and it is alleged that she was tortured by the applicant. Though there is no suicide note recovered. The alleged offence took place on 27.11.2024 and the complaint has been registered on 25.12.2024 and hence, now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicant and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. There are not antecedents against the present applicant. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top