SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 765

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
SAILESH AMRITLAL DENDOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS UNNATI V PAREKH(12781) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11191010240365 of 2024 registered with Madhavpura Police Station, Ahmedabad.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the age of prosecutrix was merely 12 years at the relevant time, whereas the age of present applicant was 18 years. Having regard to the age of the prosecutrix at the time of incident, the application should be dismissed.

5. Learned advocate for the original complainant has also opposed the present application citing the age of prosecutrix at the relevant time.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Learned APP has produced the statemen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top