IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, NISHA M. THAKORE, JJ.
State Of Gujarat & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Babubhai Bhalabhai Parikh & Ors. – Respondents
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 6132 of 2024 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 462 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 462 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18259 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 257 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 463 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 463 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13954 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 464 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 464 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13741 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 752 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 465 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 465 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15167 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 753 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 466 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 466 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17195 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 756 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 467 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 467 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15198 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 763 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 468 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 468 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15195 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 855 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 469 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 469 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2434 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 872 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 470 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 470 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20123 of 2022 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 873 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 471 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 471 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 553 of 2024
Decided On : 26-03-2025
(A) Civil Appeal No. 2471 of 2023 - Supreme Court judgment regarding pension increment for retired employees - The Supreme Court clarified the implementation of one increment for pensioners, effective from 01.05.2023, with specific provisions for various categories of cases. (Paras 2, 4, 10)
(B) Pension Law - The court emphasized that the State must adhere to the Supreme Court's directives without alteration or additional clauses. (Paras 9, 10)
Facts of the case:
The litigation arose from the Supreme Court's judgment regarding the entitlement of pensioners to an increment, leading to various applications and appeals for clarification and implementation.
Findings of Court:
The court directed the State to implement the Supreme Court's order regarding the increment within six months and clarified that excess payments made would not be recovered.
Issues: The main issues included the implementation of the Supreme Court's order regarding pension increments and the State's compliance with these directives.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the State must follow the Supreme Court's directives as they are, without modification, ensuring that pensioners receive their entitled benefits.
Result: Miscellaneous applications disposed of.
ORDER :
(A.S. SUPEHIA, J.)
With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, delay, if any, is condoned and leave to appeal, if any, is granted in the matters. Upon directions of this Court, registry has circulated the Letters Patent Appeals on today’s board itself.
1. The issue pertains to the grant of one increment to the employees of the entire State, who have retired from services and are getting pension.
2. The genesis of the entire litigation, as mentioned in numerous orders passed by this Court in various proceedings, lies in the judgment and order of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2471 of 2023 (SLP (c) No.9185 of 2020) in the case of The Director (Admin & HR) KPTCL and others Vs C.P. Mundinamani and Ors., dated 11th April, 2023. Large number of employees are extended the benefit of one increment as per the directions issued by the learned Single Judges and on disposals of the Letters Patent Appeals in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of C.P. Mundinamani and Ors. (supra)
3. Thereafter, it appears that an application being Miscellaneous Application Diary No.2400 of 2024 was filed before the Apex Court seeking clarification of the said judgment, and accordingly, the Supreme Court passed an order dated 6th September, 2024 clarifying the manner in which the benefit of one increment has to be extended.
4. After the disposal of the matters, the Supreme Court finally, in the order dated 20th February, 2025 passed in Miscellaneous Application Diary No.2400 of 2024, has laid quietus to the entire issue of granting the benefit of one increment to the employees by further clarifying the order dated 6th September, 2024. The entire order is incorporated as under :
“Delay condoned.
We had passed the following interim order dated 06.09.2024, the operative portion of which reads as under:
“(a) The judgment dated 11.04.2023 will be given effect to in case of third parties from the date of the judgment, that is, the pension by taking into account one increment will be payable on and after 01.05.2023. Enhanced pension for the period prior to 31.04.2023 will not be paid.
(b) For persons who have filed writ petitions and succeeded, the directions given in the said judgment will operate as res judicata, and accordingly, an enhanced pension by taking one increment would have to be paid.
(c) The direction in (b) will not apply, where the judgment has not attained finality, and cases where an appeal has been preferred, or if filed, is entertained by the appellate court.
(d) In case any retired employee has filed any application for intervention/impleadment in Civil Appeal No. 3933/2023 or any other writ petition and a beneficial order has been passed, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable from the month in which the application for intervention/ impleadment was filed.”
We are inclined to dispose of the present miscellaneous applications directing that Clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the order dated 06.09.2024 will be treated as final directions. We are, however, of the opinion that Clause (d) of the order dated 06.09.2024 requires modification which shall now read as under:
“(d) In case any retired employee filed an application for intervention/impleadment/writ petition/original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal/High Courts/this Court, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable for the period of three years prior to the month in which the application for intervention/ impleadment/ writ petition/original application was filed.”
Further, clause (d) will not apply to the retired government employee who filed a writ petition/original application or an application for intervention before the Central Administrative Tribunal/High Courts/this Court after the judgment in “Union of India & Anr. v. M. Siddaraj”, as in such cases, clause (a) will apply.
Recording the aforesaid, the miscellaneous applications are disposed of.
We, further, clarify that in case any
AI
The Supreme Court's directives on pension increments for retired employees must be implemented by the State without modification, ensuring compliance within specified timelines.
The Supreme Court's directive on granting one increment to pensioners is binding, effective from 01.05.2023, with no retroactive payments, and excess payments made will not be recovered.
The Supreme Court clarified that retired employees are entitled to one increment in pension from 01.05.2023, with no recovery of excess payments already made.
The Supreme Court clarified that retired employees are entitled to one increment for pension calculations effective from May 1, 2023, with provisions for timely compliance by state authorities and no....
The court condoned a significant delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal to ensure uniform treatment of employees in accordance with Supreme Court directives regarding increments.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing an appeal to ensure uniformity in the treatment of employees as directed by the Supreme Court.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing an appeal to ensure uniformity in the application of Supreme Court directives regarding employee increments.
The Supreme Court's clarification on the grant of one increment is binding, and no contempt was found as the applicant received the increment as directed.
The Supreme Court's order on the grant of one increment to employees is binding and must be applied consistently, with specific provisions for ongoing litigations.
The Supreme Court clarified that the judgment regarding the grant of one increment to employees is effective from 01.05.2023, with specific conditions for those involved in ongoing litigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.