SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1062

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, NISHA M. THAKORE, JJ.
State Of Gujarat & Ors. - Applicants
Versus 
Gujarat Rajya Nivrut Karmachari Sakhavati Mahamandal Through Chandulal Vishram Joshi - Respondent 
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 472 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 472 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 549 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 875 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 473 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 473 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 557 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 877 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 474 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 474 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 556 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 878 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 475 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 475 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 539 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 879 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 476 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 476 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12327 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 881 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 477 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 477 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 560 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 882 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 478 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 478 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 532 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 883 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 479 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 479 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17021 of 2023 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 885 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 480 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 480 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 550 of 2024 With R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 886 of 2025 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 481 of 2025 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 481 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 555 of 2024
Decided On : 26-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : MR. G.H. Virk, Government Pleader with Mr. Aditya Pathak, AGP.

The Supreme Court's directive on granting one increment to pensioners is binding, effective from 01.05.2023, with no retroactive payments, and excess payments made will not be recovered.

Headnote:

(A) Supreme Court - Civil Appeal No. 2471 of 2023 - Grant of one increment to retired employees - The Supreme Court clarified the implementation of one increment for pensioners, stating that it will be effective from 01.05.2023, with no retroactive payments for periods prior to this date. The court emphasized that any excess payments made will not be recovered. (Paras 2, 4, 9, 10, 11)

(B) Implementation of Supreme Court Orders - The State Government is mandated to follow the Supreme Court's directions without alteration or additional clauses. The court cannot issue further clarifications beyond the Supreme Court's orders. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The case revolves around the entitlement of retired employees to receive an increment in their pension, as directed by the Supreme Court in a previous ruling. The Supreme Court's orders clarified the conditions under which this increment should be applied, leading to various applications and appeals regarding its implementation.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Supreme Court's directives regarding the increment and clarified that the State must implement these orders within a specified timeframe, ensuring no recovery of excess payments.

Issues: The main issues included the proper implementation of the Supreme Court's order regarding the increment and the apprehensions of employees regarding compliance by the State Government.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the State must adhere strictly to the Supreme Court's orders without modification, emphasizing the finality of the Supreme Court's directives and the necessity for timely compliance.

Result: Miscellaneous applications disposed of, with directions for implementation of the Supreme Court's order.

ORDER :

(A.S. SUPEHIA, J.)

With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, delay, if any, is condoned and leave to appeal, if any, is granted in the matters. Upon directions of this Court, registry has circulated the Letters Patent Appeals on today’s board itself.

1. The issue pertains to the grant of one increment to the employees of the entire State, who have retired from services and are getting pension.

2. The genesis of the entire litigation, as mentioned in numerous orders passed by this Court in various proceedings, lies in the judgment and order of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2471 of 2023 (SLP (c) No.9185 of 2020) in the case of The Director (Admin & HR) KPTCL and others Vs C.P. Mundinamani and Ors., dated 11th April, 2023. Large number of employees are extended the benefit of one increment as per the directions issued by the learned Single Judges and on disposals of the Letters Patent Appeals in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of C.P. Mundinamani and Ors. (supra)

3. Thereafter, it appears that an application being Miscellaneous Application Diary No.2400 of 2024 was filed before the Apex Court seeking clarification of the said judgment, and accordingly, the Supreme Court passed an order dated 6th September, 2024 clarifying the manner in which the benefit of one increment has to be extended.

4. After the disposal of the matters, the Supreme Court finally, in the order dated 20th February, 2025 passed in Miscellaneous Application Diary No.2400 of 2024, has laid quietus to the entire issue of granting the benefit of one increment to the employees by further clarifying the order dated 6th September, 2024. The entire order is incorporated as under :

“Delay condoned.

We had passed the following interim order dated 06.09.2024, the operative portion of which reads as under:

“(a) The judgment dated 11.04.2023 will be given effect to in case of third parties from the date of the judgment, that is, the pension by taking into account one increment will be payable on and after 01.05.2023. Enhanced pension for the period prior to 31.04.2023 will not be paid.

(b) For persons who have filed writ petitions and succeeded, the directions given in the said judgment will operate as res judicata, and accordingly, an enhanced pension by taking one increment would have to be paid.

(c) The direction in (b) will not apply, where the judgment has not attained finality, and cases where an appeal has been preferred, or if filed, is entertained by the appellate court.

(d) In case any retired employee has filed any application for intervention/impleadment in Civil Appeal No. 3933/2023 or any other writ petition and a beneficial order has been passed, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable from the month in which the application for intervention/ impleadment was filed.”

We are inclined to dispose of the present miscellaneous applications directing that Clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the order dated 06.09.2024 will be treated as final directions. We are, however, of the opinion that Clause (d) of the order dated 06.09.2024 requires modification which shall now read as under:

“(d) In case any retired employee filed an application for intervention/impleadment/writ petition/original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal/High Courts/this Court, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable for the period of three years prior to the month in which the application for intervention/ impleadment/ writ petition/original application was filed.”

Further, clause (d) will not apply to the retired government employee who filed a writ petition/original application or an application for intervention before the Central Administrative Tribunal/High Courts/this Court after the judgment in “Union of India & Anr. v. M. Siddaraj”, as in such cases, clause (a) will apply.

Recording the aforesaid, the miscellaneous applications are disposed of.

We, further, clarify that in case any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top