SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1108

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Mahendrasinh @ Jigo Natvarbhaigohel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Asmita Patel, APP.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rathin P. Raval, Mr. Nishit A. Bhalodi.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appeal has been filed by the State challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 22.6.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no.5, Nadiad in Sessions Case no.74 of 2008.

2. The charge was framed under Sections 498A, 306 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”). The charge states that the deceased had married accused no.1–Mahendrasinh @ Jigo Natwarbhai Gohel and the matrimonial relation was of 3 years. After about one year of marriage, the complainant alleged that all the accused had started harassing the accused on the ground that she was not well-versed with the domestic work and when she conceived and was with five months’ foetus, they started making false allegations regarding her character, and that mental and physical harassment has resulted into cruelty and that when it was unbearable, on 13.4.2008 at about 09 O’Clock, she consumed poison at Khodiyarpara Chhapra and committed suicide and therefore, the charge for abetment to commit suicide was framed.

3. Ms. Asmita Patel, learned APP has submitted that the Trial Court judgment is erroneous and contrary to law. The learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top