Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,J, SUSHIL KUKREJA,J
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sushil Kukreja, J.
The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant/State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment, dated 21.04.2014, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., in S.C. (RBT) No. 5- G/VII/13/09, whereby the accused persons (respondents herein) were acquitted for the offences punishable under Section 498-A and 306 read with Section 34 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “IPC”).
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, as per the prosecution story, can be summarized as under:
2(a). On 22.11.2008 Smt Pooja (deceased) got married with accused Sanjay Kumar according to Hindu rites and customs. Thereafter, the deceased started residing with accused Sanjay Kumar at his residence, where accused Urmila, mother-in-law of the deceased also used to reside. As per the prosecution case, immediately after the marriage, the deceased was being maltreated and tortured by the accused persons. The deceased telephonically intimated her father, who convened Panchayat consisting of Smt. Saroj, Up-Pardhan, Shri Dharam Pal and Rajnish, who visited the house of the accused persons and
In appeals against acquittal, the presumption of innocence prevails, requiring clear evidence of instigation or cruelty for a conviction under IPC sections concerning abetment of suicide.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's actions directly abetted the suicide, with evidence of cruelty being essential for conviction under IPC Sections 498-A and 306.
In appeals against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and mere allegations of harassment do not suffice for conviction under Section 306 IPC.
Court emphasized the necessity of establishing clear evidence of cruelty to invoke presumption of abetment of suicide under Section 113A of the Evidence Act, reinforcing the presumption of innocence ....
The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC Sections 306 and 498-A; clear evidence of instigation is necessary.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for substantial and credible evidence to prove serious offences like harassment and abetment of suicide. The judgment also emphasiz....
The judgment reaffirms the principle of presumption of innocence, the need for clear evidence in cases of abetment of suicide, and the reluctance to disturb a trial court's finding of acquittal unles....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC sections related to abetment of suicide.
In appeals against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment of suicide.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in cases of acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for reliable evidence linking alleged cruelty to suicide.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
