HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.S. SUPEHIA, GITA GOPI
Child Development Plan Officer – Appellant
Versus
Ajitsinh Ramsinh Dodiya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay (Para 1) |
| 2. opposition to condonation of delay (Para 4) |
| 3. reliance on previous judgments (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. uniformity in treatment of employees (Para 13) |
ORDER :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 425 days in filing the captioned appeal.
2. At the outset, learned advocate Ms.Aishvarya has submitted that against the very same order, Letters Patent Appeal No.155 of 2025 filed by the Executive Engineer against its employees has been disposed of by the order dated 20.01.2025. She has submitted that in the present proceedings are only confined to the respondent No.1, who is the employee of the appellant.
3. Learned AGP has submitted that in various appeals after condoning the delay of similar nature, the appeals are disposed of in light of the order of the Supreme Court dated 11.04.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No.2471 of 2023. She has submitted that in most of the matters, learned advocates appearing for the respective parties had consented for condoning the delay and ultimately, had agreed that the order may be passed in the present appeals in light of the order passed
The court condoned a 425-day delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for uniformity in applying Supreme Court directives regarding employee increments.
The court condoned the delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal to ensure uniformity in the treatment of employees as per the Supreme Court's directives regarding the grant of one increment.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing an appeal to maintain uniformity in applying a Supreme Court order regarding employee increments.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing an appeal to ensure uniformity in the application of Supreme Court directives regarding employee increments.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing an appeal to ensure uniformity in the treatment of employees as directed by the Supreme Court.
The court condoned a significant delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal to ensure uniform treatment of employees in accordance with Supreme Court directives regarding increments.
The court condoned the delay in filing Letters Patent Appeals to ensure uniformity in the treatment of employees following the Supreme Court's clarification on pension increments.
The Supreme Court clarified that retired employees are entitled to one increment for pension calculations effective from May 1, 2023, with provisions for timely compliance by state authorities and no....
The Supreme Court's directives on pension increments for retired employees must be implemented by the State without modification, ensuring compliance within specified timelines.
The Supreme Court clarified that retired employees are entitled to one increment in pension from 01.05.2023, with no recovery of excess payments already made.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.