SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J., D.N.RAY, J.
Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai - Appellant 
Versus
The Manager & Ors. - Respondent 
R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 17 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3980 of 2019 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 18 of 2019 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 19 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4254 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4300 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6674 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6676 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6699 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6697 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6728 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6682 of 2019 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 67 of 2019 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 66 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4680 of 2022 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4777 of 2022 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4676 of 2022 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 68 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8896 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13951 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14092 of 2019 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2020 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14092 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14091 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13915 of 2019 With  R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13820 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13920 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12984 of 2019 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 169 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15570 of 2018 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FIXING DATE OF EARLY HEARING) NO. 1 of 2020 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15570 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18252 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20084 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20272 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19390 of 2018 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 2 of 2023 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19390 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22603 of 2019 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20161 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20167 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2049 of 2020 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1371 of 2020
Decided on : 08-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR PATHIK M ACHARYA
For the Respondent:MS.MANISHA LAVKUMAR, LD. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR. RAJ TANNA, ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, MR.MIHIR JOSHI, SENIOR COUNSEL WITH MR.MITUL SHELAT, MS.RAVEENA KINHABWALA AND MS DISHA N NANAVATY(2957)

Insured farmers must receive timely compensation as per the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, with obligation on insurance companies to expedite claim settlements.

Headnote:(A) Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, 2016 - Provision for insurance claims - Non-payment of claims to insured farmers due to delayed processing by the Insurance Company - The Court directed the Insurance Company to settle Rs.7,48,86,898/- in claims for 15,047 farmers promptly, asserting maintainability of PIL despite objections from the Insurance Company. (Paras 1, 8, 9)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability - The court emphasized the significance of conducting a comprehensive exercise to address farmers' claims, rejecting the Insurance Company's challenge to PIL maintainability, reinforcing that individual claims do not impede the collective interest in the pursuit of justice. (Paras 6, 7)

Table of Content
1. examination of insured farmers' claims (Para 1)
2. pending claims and compensation for kharif-2017 (Para 2 , 3)
3. maintainability of the public interest litigation (Para 4 , 5)
4. mandate for the insurance company to process claims (Para 6 , 7)
5. court’s directions for claim settlements (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J.

1. Having heard Mr.Mihir Joshi, the learned Senior Counsel with Mr.Mitul Shelat, Ms.Raveena Kinhabwala and Ms.Disha Nanavaty, Ms. Manisha Lavkumar, the learned Additional Advocate General with Mr.Raj Tanna, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the learned advocate Mr.P. B. Khambholja, the learned advocate Mr.Satish A. Pandya and Mr.Sangram Chinnappa for Mr.Subodh Kumud appearing in respective matters at length, suffice it to record that pursuant to an order dated 07.10.2020 passed by this Court, in this Public Interest Litigation, a Committee constituted by the State Government had examined claims of all insured farmers by considering the representation of such farmers, after summoning information from the insurance company. The insurance company reported to have been provided the details which were considered by the said Committee and an order dated 11.07.2023 has been passed by the Director of Agriculture, Gandhinagar based on the report considering the information received, operational guidelines of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana and the aims and objectives of the PMFBY.

2. The order of the Director of Agriculture, Gandhinagar brought on record with the affidavit dated 09.11.2023 filed by the Assistant Director of Agriculture (CIS – 1) records that as per the order, during Kharif- 2017 season, claim settlement of Rs.7,48,86,898/- towards 15,047 insured farmers (District- wise information given in Table – 9) are still pending, out of total 3,73,501 insured farmers of Cluster – 5 (Surendranagar, Morbi, Patan, Anand and Banaskantha) Districts. The insurance company namely SBI General Insurance Company Limited is required to pay these eligible claims at the earliest without any further delay. The operative portion of the order of the Director of Agriculture, Gandhinagar is required to be noted hereinunder:-

“10. Conclusion:

I. Total 3,73,501 farmers were insured farmers during Kharif-2017 in Cluster-5 districts and farmer's share premium was deducted and remitted to SBIGIC as per the information given dated 28.01.2022.

II. SBIGIC had paid Claims under Localised Calamities.

SBIGIC had paid claims of 21,134 farmers under localised calamities in Cluster-5 districts. Out of farmers, 2 farmers also found eligible for payable claim difference amount of Rs.6035/-(Annexure-C) as per the Para no. XV.1.

(a) of OPGs and minutes of GOI dated 23.01.2019.

III. SBIGIC had paid Claims under season end yield (wide spread Calamities).

SBIGIC had accepted and paid claims of 69,799 farmers under season end yield based claim in accordance with the operational guidelines para no. XI.10. Out of 69,799 farmers, 113 farmers are found eligible for season end yield based payable claim difference amount of Rs. 39,866/- (Annexure-E) as per the Para no. XI.10 of OPGs and 1096 farmers are eligible for localised calamity based payable claim of Rs.42,00,154/- (Annexure-F) as per the provision of para no. XV.1. (a). iv OPGs under PMFBY and as per on the decision of Minutes dated 23.01.2019.

IV. SBIGIC had accepted but not paid claims under any risks.

SBIGIC had accepted but still not paid claims to 3215 insured farmers, However, out of above 3215 insured farmers, Localised Calamity claims of 905 farmers and season end yield based claims of 2310 farmers are eligible for claim settlement of Rs.94,73,131/- which is still pending towards all 3215 farmers by SB GIC.

V. Insured Farmers considered non eligible under all risks as per the SBIGIC during kharif-2017 Total 2,79,353 insured farmers in Cluster-5 districts considered non eligible for claim settlement under all the risks by SBIGIC. However, out of above 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top