IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J.VORA, P.M.RAVAL
Nareshbhai Devjibhai Gohil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
P. M. RAVAL, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. The present application is preferred by the applicant – original accused under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 2.7.2018 by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No.7 of 2015.
3. Learned advocate Ms.Mayuri P.Chauhan appearing for the applicant has mainly contended as follows:
(a) That the applicant has undergone 9 years and more in custody and it is not likely that the main appeal would be heard in near future and the main accused Dilipkumar has been enlarged on bail by the coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 20.2.2023 and has prayed to enlarge the applicant on bail.
(b) That the present applicant is not named in the FIR nor has the applicant being identified and merely on suspicion, the applicant has been arrested and convicted in the crime.
(c) That when the main accused had inflicted injury due to which the deceased succumbed and when no role whatsoever of injury has been attributed to the applicant, the applic
Omprakash Sahni Vs Jai Shankar Chaudhary and Another
The court established that a defendant can seek suspension of sentence if strong prima facie evidence suggests that conviction may not be sustainable, particularly when serious charges are involved.
The court emphasized that the appellate process requires a strict evaluation of evidence to determine if there exist prima facie grounds for the sustainability of conviction, restricting evidence rea....
The appellate court emphasized that suspension of sentence requires a prima facie examination of potential errors in conviction, especially in serious offences where identification of the accused is ....
Suspension of sentence may be granted if a prima facie assessment shows the conviction may not be sustainable, particularly in serious offences, while considering the duration of incarceration.
The court established that in serious offences, convictions should not be automatically sustained, and there must be evident grounds for suspicion or errors to allow for the suspension of sentences d....
The court found that mere presence at the scene of a crime without substantive involvement can justify suspension of sentence in appeal for serious offenses.
Suspension of sentence in a serious offence requires substantial evidence and consideration of the likelihood of acquittal; conviction cannot stand without corroboration.
The court establishes that proper assessment of evidence is crucial for suspension of sentence in serious offences.
Appellate courts must evaluate apparent errors in conviction before granting bail in cases involving serious offences, relying on objective assessment of the evidence presented.
An applicant convicted under the POCSO Act may secure sentence suspension if the evidence reveals no direct involvement or overt acts, indicating potential for acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.