Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J.VORA, P.M.RAVAL
Pavankumar Munshiram Kumbhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. By way of this application under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Nayay Sanhita 2023, the applicant-Pavankumar Munshiram Kumbhar-original accused seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 13.5.2025 by the learned Special Judge (POCSO) & Additional Sessions Judge, Porbandar in Special POCSO Case No.10 of 2023.
3. By the aforesaid judgment and order of conviction and sentence, the present applicant convict has been held guilty for the commission of offences as stated hereinbelow :
| Section | Imprisonment Fine in Rs. | In default of payment of fine. |
| 4 r/w 17 of POCSO Act | 20 years RI 10000/- | RI for 15 days |
| 6 r/w 17 of POCSO Act | 20 years RI 10000/- | RI for 15 days |
| 8 r/w 17 of POCSO Act | 3 years RI 2000/- | RI for 15 days |
4. Learned advocate Mr.Vishal Anandjiwala appearing for the applicant has mainly contended as follows:
(a) That the role of the applicant accused is of abetment in the commission of offence since the applicant has just accompanied the accused No.1 from Rajasthan to Porbandar.
(b) That the prosecution has failed to establish that the applica
An applicant convicted under the POCSO Act may secure sentence suspension if the evidence reveals no direct involvement or overt acts, indicating potential for acquittal.
The court established that in serious offences, convictions should not be automatically sustained, and there must be evident grounds for suspicion or errors to allow for the suspension of sentences d....
The court emphasized that the appellate process requires a strict evaluation of evidence to determine if there exist prima facie grounds for the sustainability of conviction, restricting evidence rea....
The court established that a defendant can seek suspension of sentence if strong prima facie evidence suggests that conviction may not be sustainable, particularly when serious charges are involved.
Suspension of sentence may be granted if a prima facie assessment shows the conviction may not be sustainable, particularly in serious offences, while considering the duration of incarceration.
The court found that mere presence at the scene of a crime without substantive involvement can justify suspension of sentence in appeal for serious offenses.
Appellate courts must evaluate apparent errors in conviction before granting bail in cases involving serious offences, relying on objective assessment of the evidence presented.
The appellate court emphasized that suspension of sentence requires a prima facie examination of potential errors in conviction, especially in serious offences where identification of the accused is ....
Suspension of sentence in a serious offence requires substantial evidence and consideration of the likelihood of acquittal; conviction cannot stand without corroboration.
Suspension of sentence requires strong grounds demonstrating a fair chance of acquittal; mere incarceration duration does not suffice for bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
