Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J.VORA, P.M.RAVAL
Chandrakant Meghajibhai Daki – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments of the applicant and prosecution (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and conviction (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. criteria for suspension of sentence in serious offenses (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision to suspend sentence (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
P. M. RAVAL, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent State.
2. The present application is preferred by original accused No.9 – Chandrakant Meghajibhai Daki under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 28.2.2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court No.16, Ahmedabad City in Sessions Case No.185 of 2009.
3. The facts of the case in nutshell are as follows:
3.1. On 15th June, 2006 deceased Pankajbhai Trivedi was assaulted by four unknown assailants around 8.30 p.m., near Ellisbridge Gymkhana in the city of Ahmedabad. He received fatal injuries and the injuries were caused with baseball bat and other weapons. He died instantaneously. The FIR was lodged by one Ramesh Vishvakarma on the same night at ab
An appellate court must assess evidence critically and cannot rely solely on uncorroborated testimonies when considering suspension of a sentence, especially in murder cases.
Suspension of sentence in a serious offence requires substantial evidence and consideration of the likelihood of acquittal; conviction cannot stand without corroboration.
The court underscored the necessity of a rigorous evidentiary standard for convictions, particularly in serious offenses like murder, mandating a cautious approach regarding suspension of sentences p....
Suspension of sentence during appeal is warranted when prosecution evidence is substantially unsupported, indicating potential for acquittal.
The court established that a defendant can seek suspension of sentence if strong prima facie evidence suggests that conviction may not be sustainable, particularly when serious charges are involved.
Suspension of sentence requires careful evaluation of the case's evidential gaps, especially in serious offenses like murder.
Suspension of sentencing in serious offences requires clear evidence of error in conviction; reliance on unverified testimonies cannot warrant bail.
The court emphasized that the appellate process requires a strict evaluation of evidence to determine if there exist prima facie grounds for the sustainability of conviction, restricting evidence rea....
Suspension of sentence can only be granted in exceptional cases for serious offences, requiring substantial justification, as established by the appellate court.
The appellate court emphasized that suspension of sentence requires a prima facie examination of potential errors in conviction, especially in serious offences where identification of the accused is ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
