IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
Indian Overseas Bank - Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 12196 Of 2024
Decided On : 04-08-2025
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
“26.A. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or certiorari or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and/or certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Revenue Entry No. 8058 dated 02.03.2024, in respect of the said Property recording the purported charge of Respondent No. 4 over the said Property on the basis of Respondent No.4's application dated 02.03.2024;
B. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to:
(a) the Respondent No. 3 to forthwith and without any demur accept the sale certificate dated 02.05.2024 annexed at Annexure G" hereto for the purpose of registration and issue a certificate under Section 60 of the Registration Act, 1908 in respect of the sale certificate dated 02.05.2024;
(b) the Respondent No.5 to mutate necessary entries in the relevant revenue records, recording the sale of the said Property in favour of the Respondent No.7;
C. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, granting a mandatory injunction against the Respondent Nos.1 to 6, their men, agents, staffs, subordinates, employees, officers and associates, restraining them from dealing with, creating any charge and/or attempting to do any of the foregoing in respect of the said Property or any portion thereof in any manner whatsoever;
D. Pending hearing and final disposal of this Petition, this Hon'ble Court by way of ad-interim/interim relief be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to accept and lodge the application for registration of the Sale Certificate dated 02.05.2024;
E. Pending hearing and final disposal of this Petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondent Nos.1 to 6, their men, agents, staffs, subordinates, employees, officers and associates from dealing with, creating any charge and/or attempting to do any of the foregoing in respect of the said Property or any portion thereof in any manner whatsoever;
F. Ex-parte ad interim and/or interim relief in terms of Prayers D and E be granted;
G. For Costs; and H. Such other and further relief as may be considered fit and expedient in the facts of the present case be granted.”
2. The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner is a Bank duly constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. A piece and parcel of land being Survey No.556, Village Mithirohar, Taluka Gandhidham, Kutch admeasuring 52,913 sq. mts. came to be mortgaged in favour of the petitioner as a security for a credit facility extended to the respondent No.8 i.e. Patel Woods Products Limited by way of equitable mortgage on deposit of title deeds. That accordingly a charge on the said property came to be registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with the Registrar of Companies. That the respondent No.8 company defaulted in repayment of its loan and therefore, the account of the respondent No.8 came to be declared as Non Performing Asset (‘NPA’ for short) on 27.02.2012 in accordance with the applicable directives and guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India. That pursuant to the declaration of the account of the respondent No.8 as NPA, the petitioner Bank issued a notice dated 03.12.2012 under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act” for short) to the respondent No.8 to repay its liability aggregating to Rs.79,40,71,061.66 as on 26.11.2012. Since the respondent No.8 failed to make the payment, the petitioner invoked its statutory right under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act and took symbolic possession of the property on
AI
The provisions of the SARFAESI Act grant secured creditors priority over state tax dues, rendering any conflicting claims by tax authorities ineffective.
Secured creditors' rights under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act take precedence over state tax claims, confirming the principle of priority for registered interests.
Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act establishes that secured creditors have priority over State revenue claims, reinforcing the enforceability of secured debts post-registration.
Secured creditors have priority over State debts under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, invalidating conflicting State charges on mortgaged assets.
Secured creditors' debts take precedence over state tax claims, as established by Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act.
The provisions of Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act 2002 and Section 31B of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 create "First Charge" by way of priority in favour of the Banks and Financial ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.