Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S.SUPEHIA, R.T.VACHHANI
Neha Rameshbhai Rathod – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar Ramsangbhai Chaudhari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
ORDER ON LPA Nos.439 of 2025 and 441 of 2025 :
1. ADMIT. Learned advocates appear and waive service of notice of admission on behalf of the respective respondents.
2. The captioned appeals being Letters Patent Appeals Nos.439 and 441 of 2025 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865, are directed against the judgment and order dated 27.02.2025, passed in the captioned writ petition filed by the private respondents. The learned Single Judge has allowed the petitions by directing the respondent–State authorities to delete the names of the present appellants from the select list. Whereas the Letters Patent Appeal No.101 of 2025 is filed against the judgment and order dated 02.07.2024 passed in Special Civil Application No.9754 of 2024 filed by the appellants – original petitioners (Kishankumar Babubhai Chamar Changecha and others).
3. The entire case of the respective parties hinges on the judgment and order of the Division Bench dated 10.11.2023 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.705 of 2023 in Special Civil Application No. 15597 of 2017.
BRIEF FACTS :
4. The issue raised in the present appeals arise between two sets of candidates; one who possess the qua
Judgments in employment cases are subject to concepts of laches and acquiescence, whereby delayed claims can be denied relief, emphasizing the need for timely challenges to selection processes.
Point of law : If there is some minor irregularity in selection of a candidate but if such a candidate has put in a number of years of service, it may not be advisable to disturb his appointment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the illegality of appointments made by the Panchayat Employment Committee, the entitlement of the writ petitioner to be offered appointment and con....
Employees selected under the same process maintain seniority regardless of appointment delays, and delays not attributable to them cannot deprive them of benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the rules existing at the commencement of the selection process and the limitations of judicial review in interfering....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
