IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI
Shardaben, Daughter Of Ishwarlal Bhogilal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GITA GOPI, J.
1. By the judgment dated 26.12.2005, the Additional Sessions Judge, Banaskantha at Deesa in Sessions Case Nos.30 of 2004 and 69 of 2004, convicted the present three appellants under Sections 498A and 306 read with Section 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “IPC”) and sentenced them for one year rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 498A and a fine of Rs.500/- each and in default of payment of fine further one month simple imprisonment, and for the offence under Section 306 of IPC, the appellants were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default thereof, to undergo a further simple imprisonment for three months.
2. The trial under Sections 498A, 306 read with Section 114 of IPC was against five accused. Godavariben (A3) – the mother/ mother-in-law and Kailashben (A4) – sister/sister-in-law were acquitted, while Shardaben (A1), Jasiben (A2) and Kokilaben (A5), present appellants as sisters and sisters-in-law were convicted.
2.1 The complainant - Hiralal Naranlal Thakkar, resident of village Shihori filed FIR before Deodar Police Station on 06.11.2003 for the alleged commission of offence
Mahendra Singh v. State of M.P.
Manoj Kumar Sharma And Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh And Anr.
Jai Prakash Singh Vs. State of Bihar
State Of Kerala And Ors. Vs S.Unnikrishnan Nair And Ors.
State of West Bengal Vs. Orilal Jaiswal
M. Mohan v. State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Mahendra K.C. v. State of Karnataka and another
Jagdishraj Khatta Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
State of A.P. Vs. M. Madhusudhan Rao
S.S. Chheena Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan
Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Prosecution must establish clear intent and mens rea for abetment of suicide; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC.
Abetment of suicide requires direct evidence of incitement or provocation near the time of the act, rather than merely historical instances of harassment or cruelty.
To convict for abetment of suicide, there must be clear evidence of instigation or direct action by the accused proximate to the suicide, demonstrating mens rea; mere allegations of harassment are in....
Conviction under sections 498A and 306 requires concrete evidence of cruelty and direct acts of abetment; mere allegations and delays in FIR are insufficient for a successful prosecution.
Mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under Section 306 IPC; the prosecution must prove intentional abetment, with clear evidence linking the accused's conduct to the victim'....
Abetment to suicide under IPC Sections 306 and 498A necessitates proof of instigation or influencing behavior, requiring thorough examination in trial; mere allegations do not suffice.
Conviction under IPC Sections 498A and 306 requires clear evidence of cruelty and instigation, which was not established in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.