Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, D.M.Vyas
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ramaben @ Saguben Ranjitbhai Chu.Koli – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. acquittal appeal overview and case facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's analysis of medical evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. principles governing appeals against acquittals. (Para 21) |
| 5. final judgment and closure of the appeal. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
D. M. Vyas, J.
1. This acquittal appeal is preferred by the State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (‘the CRPC’ for short) against the judgment and order dated 08/10/2012 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar in Sessions Case No.48 of 2011 wherein, the respondents-original accused no.1 Ramaben @ Saguben Ranjitbhai Chu.Koli, accused no.2, Jerambhai Ishwarbhai Chu.Koli, came to be tried for the offences punishable under Sections 302 , 306, 323, 504, 506(2) read with Section 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (‘the IPC for short). At the end of the trial, the trial court acquitted the respondents from all the charges giving the benefit of doubt.
2. Brief facts of the case, giving rise to the present appeal, are as under:
3. It is the case of the prosecution that on 10/03/2011, the complainant Janakben Gel
The appellate court affirmed that an acquittal should stand unless the lower court's decision is fundamentally flawed, highlighting the principle of presumption of innocence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and acquittals carry a double presumption of innocence, requiring strong grounds for reversal.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing that acquittals should not be disturbed unless there is clear evidence of guilt, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence after an acquittal and may only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by credible evidence, emphasizing the h....
In criminal appeals, courts may reappraise evidence but uphold acquittals unless evidence proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for clear proof of guilt.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence for conviction and the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
