SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. Mengdey, Maulik J.Shelat, JJ.
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Batmunadan Mrugesh Pillai – Respondent
R/Criminal Appeal No. 1354 of 2004
Decided On : 19-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Public Prosecutor

In criminal appeals, courts may reappraise evidence but uphold acquittals unless evidence proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, maintaining the presumption of innocence.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 378 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Appeal by State against acquittal of accused in murder case - Trial Court acquitted accused due to lack of evidence supporting murder charge; prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and no eye-witnesses corroborated claims - The Trial Court noted that the medical evidence indicated death was due to ligature strangulation but did not conclusively link accused to the crime. (Paras 1, 16.1-16.8)

(B) Acquittal appeals - In appeals against acquittal, courts can reappreciate evidence - Principle of double presumption in favor of the accused must be maintained unless error is shown in Trial Court's finding. (Paras 14, 41)

Facts of the case:
The deceased's accidental death was initially proclaimed as such; however, a post-mortem revealed strangulation as cause of death. The accused was acquitted on grounds of insufficient evidence linking him to the homicide. (Paras 3-6)

Findings of Court:
The Trial Court's findings were upheld as there was no credible evidence against the accused, and the prosecution failed to meet the burden of proof required for conviction. (Paras 18-19)

Issues: Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to overturn the acquittal; whether the Trial Court misapprehended the circumstances surrounding the death of the deceased. (Paras 10, 16)

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the principle that without compelling evidence connecting the accused to the crime, the acquittal stands firm, respecting the presumption of innocence and the substantial burden of proof on the prosecution. (Para 41)

Result: Appeal dismissed; Trial Court’s order of acquittal confirmed.

JUDGMENT :

MAULIK J. SHELAT, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed by the State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgement and order dated 19th February 2004 passed by the Sessions Court, Jamnagar (hereinafter referred to as “Trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 48 of 2003. By way of the impugned judgement and order, the accused has been acquitted under Section-302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) by the Trial Court.

2. The short facts of the prosecution case are as under:

3. The alleged incident took place on 1st March 2003 in afternoon hours in the house of the first informant, who happens to be the husband of the deceased Parmeshwariben, wherein he has disclosed that the deceased sustained an accidental injury from falling in the house while doing domestic work, she sustained injuries and she was taken to the hospital at about 16:00 hours on 1st March 2003, itself and the doctor concerned declared her dead at about 16:30 hours.

4. The police appears to have been informed about the accidental death as per Section-174 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (hereinafter referred to as “CrPC”), whereby, Accident Case No.24 of 2003 has been registered by the City B-Division Police Station, Jamnagar City. It is the further case of the prosecution that during the investigation and after recording the statements of prosecution witnesses, it came to light that there was a quarrel between the first informant and the deceased on 1st March 2003 at around 13:30 hours, but in such statements were not reveal any such fact that she sustained any accidental injury due to giddiness.

5. Furthermore, the post-mortem report was received by the police which confirmed the fact that there was a strangulation mark on her neck and due to which, she succumbed to such bodily injury and died due to asphyxia on account of ligature strangulation.

6. The police after completion of investigation filed chargesheet against accused under section-302 of IPC and JMFC, Jamnagar committed the case to be tried as Session Case.

7. To prove the case against the accused, the prosecution led the following oral and documentary evidence:

Oral Evidences of Prosecution

Sr. No.Name and ParticularsExh.
1.Nilesh Bijalbhai13
2.Pravinbhai Devshibhai Jadav14
3.Jayesh Amanbhai15
4.Vijyaben Bijalbhai17
5.Gangaben Pandebhai18
6.Karnagar Dureswami Pillai20
7.Chidambaram Tan Pillai22
8.Dr. R. G. Datta7
9.Aadam Ibrahim Sama47
10.Vipul Pravinbhai Parmar48
11.Shivraj Tangvel49
12.Bijal Gordhan Sitapara50
13.Seleyan Tangayan51
14.Dharmendrasinh Lakhubha Zala52
15.Jayendrasinh Jorubha Jadeja56

Documentary Evidences of Prosecution

Sr. No.Name and ParticularsExh.
1.Original complaint54
2.Letter informing the CMO about the arrival of the deceased's body24
3.Letter to the Executive Magistrate regarding the inquest of the deceased's body25
4.Letter to C.T.B. regarding the deceased's body26
5.Inquest Panchnama9
6.Police report to be sent to the Civil Surgeon along with the body sent for postmortem examination10
7.Letter regarding post-mortem examination of the deceased8
8.Letter for taking blood sample of deceased12
9.Post mortem report11
10.Letter for taking blood sample of the accused27
11.Regarding the consent of accused consent for blood sample28
12.Statement of Mrugesh Pillai29
13.The PSI's report for filing the Accidental Death (AD) entry30
14.Panchnama of scene of offence53
15.Report made by the PSO to register a case against the accused31
16.Copy of the station diary entry dated 2/3/0332
17.Letter from PSI to the Superintendent of Police regarding sending an FSL officer to the scene of incident33
18.Report of Mobile Laboratory34
19.Letter to the Deputy Director of F.S.L. Junagadh for the examination of evidence35
20.Dispatch record of muddamal sent for examination36
21.Certificate of Power of Attorney37
22.Acknowledgment of receipt of muddamal38
23.Acknowledgement of receipt of analysis report from Deputy Director, FSL39
24.Acknowledgement list for receiving the biology report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top