IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S.SUPEHIA, R.T.VACHHANI
M.J. Indrekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present writ petition is filed assailing the Notification dated 06.05.2011 passed by the respondent No.1 on the basis of the recommendation made by the respondent No.2-Gujarat High Court, imposing the punishment of dismissal on the petitioner under the provision of Rule 6(8) of the Gujarat Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1971.
BRIEF FACTS :-
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate (First Class) in 1996. Thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Civil Judge (Senior Division) in 2005. A charge-sheet dated 23.10.2008 was issued to the petitioner, while he was serving as an Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anjar, Gandhidham, District Kachchh at Bhuj inter alia alleging that the petitioner had granted an ex-parte mandatory injunction on 27.08.2007 to the plaintiffs (owners of the tankers) of Special Civil Suit No.46 of 2007 despite being fully aware that a criminal complaint filed by one Mr.Rajesh Satyanarayan Chaudhary, Manager of Jay Ambica Oil Carriers, regarding the theft of oil from two tankers involving such tankers, was pending. It was further alleged that the petitioner igno
Abhay Jain vs. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan
Ramesh Chander Singh vs High Court of Allahabad
Krishna Prasad Verma vs State of Bihar
Judicial officers cannot face disciplinary actions solely for issuing wrong orders; such actions require clear evidence of corruption or misconduct, not mere assumptions.
The judgment emphasizes the need for integrity and probity in judicial officers, highlighting that judicial officers should possess the sterling quality of integrity and that impeccable integrity sho....
Judicial officers cannot be penalized merely for error in judgment; substantial evidence of misconduct is necessary for disciplinary action, reinforcing the duty to protect judicial independence.
The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.