IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V.PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakantbhai Rugnathbhai Chantvani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. The appeal is filed by the appellant State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 75/2007 on 19.01.2012, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 306 , 498(A), 323, 504 and 114 of IPC.
1.1 During the pendency of the appeal, the respondent no. 1 - Chandrakantbhai Rungnathbhai Chatvani had expired on 31.12.2017 and the respondent no. 2 – Ranjanben Chandrakantbhai Chatvani expired on 17.02.2017. The appeal qua the respondent no. 1 and 2 was abated by an order of this Court dated 03.03.2025.
1.2 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as “the accused” as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1 The accused nos. 1 and 2 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of deceased Komalben, the accused no. 3 is the husband and the accused nos. 4 and 5 are the sisters- in-law of deceased Komalb
The appellate court emphasized that to convict under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or direct involvement in facilitating suicide is essential; mere allegations are inadequate.
The appellate court confirmed the acquittal, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and reinforcing the presumption of innocence for the accused.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless they are unreasonable or perverse, particularly in acquittal appeals.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must uphold the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's decision lacks a reasonable basis and is perverse.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and will not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence of abetment for conviction under Section 306 IPC.
Conviction under Section 306 IPC requires proof of direct instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aid in suicide; generalized harassment allegations without proximate acts inciting suicide are insuff....
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of proving abetment of suicide beyond reasonable doubt.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and can only overturn the trial court's decision if it is unreasonable or perverse.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable or perverse.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.