SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1662

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M.PRACHCHHAK
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ramsevak Gurudayal Sakvar (Tiwari) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Lilu K. Bhaya

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.

1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant - insurance company under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter be referred to as “the Act”) challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 04.05.2007 passed by the learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Labour Court, Surat in Workmen Compensation (Non-Fatal) Case No.18 of 2003 whereby the learned Commissioner has allowed the application filed by the claimant and awarded the compensation of Rs.3,62,988.00 along with the penalty and interest.

2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order of the learned Commissioner, the present first appeal is filed by the appellant – insurance company on the grounds that learned Commissioner has committed an error in assessing the percentage of disability though in the medical certificate the disability was shown at 15%, whereas, the learned Commissioner has considered the disability at 100% and also committed an error in awarding penalty.

3. Heard Ms.Lilu Bhaya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant – insurance company. Though served, the respondent – original claimant has chosen not to appear before the Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top