Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C.DOSHI
Wilsonbhai Somchandbhai Thakor (Since deceased through legal heirs) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner and respondents (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on supervisory jurisdiction (Para 6) |
| 4. application of limitation laws and implications of fraud allegations (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition (Para 9) |
ORDER :
J. C. DOSHI, J.
1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the judgement and order dated 31.3.2017 passed by the Honourable Sessions Court in Criminal Revision Application no. 348/2014 confirming the order dated 24.9.2013, dismissed the complaint u/s. 203 of Cr. P.C. passed by the Ld. Magistrate and be pleased to further direct to proceed with the complaint in accordance with law.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under:
2.1 The petitioner lodged complaint being criminal case no. 135 of 2012 in the court of Honourable Metropolitan Magistrate, court no.5, Ahmedabad against the accused nos.2 & 3 u/s.406, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 & 114 of IPC stating the accused nos. 2 & 3 who were agricultural tenant of the land bearing survey no.195/197/1 of village Chosar, Taluka: Daskroi, Dist: Ahmedabad
High Court under Article 227 cannot intervene in matters unless serious judicial errors occur; allegations of fraud must have detailed supporting evidence for limitations to be extended.
Allegations of fraud prevent the rejection of a plaint under limitation laws, necessitating full trial for claims based on such allegations.
A decree obtained by fraud is a nullity and can be set aside by the court, emphasizing the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.
The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which allow for a suit for declaration and cancellation of an instrument concerning immoveable property.
Rejection of plaint – Plaintiffs cannot be permitted to bring suits within period of limitation by clever drafting, which otherwise is barred by limitation.
The court held that if a plaint shows no valid cause of action and is barred by limitation, it should be rejected to prevent misuse of legal process.
The satisfaction of the court regarding prima facie case is crucial for the grant of temporary injunction, and the court may exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to keep subordinate co....
A suit filed after the statutory limitation period lacks a valid cause of action and must be dismissed without trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
