Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Mountain Spinning Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Arasan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ancestral property was fraudulently sold. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented on limitation and forgery. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on limitation and plaint rejection criteria. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. civil petition rejected; plaint barred by limitation. (Para 24) |
ORDER :
R.Vijayakumar, J.
The second defendant in O.S.No.356 of 2024 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tirunelveli has filed the present civil revision petition to strike off the plaint in the said suit.
(A).Factual Matrix:
2.A perusal of the plaint reveals that the suit has been filed for the relief of recovery of possession, permanent injunction and for a declaration to declare that Document No.586 of 2004 and Document No. 2979 of 2005 on the file of the Panagudi Sub Registrar Office as null and void.
3.The plaintiff has averred that the suit schedule property measuring an extent of 16 cents in Survey No.971/2 is the ancestral property of plaintiff's father namely Cruz Antony Nadar through a registered sale deed dated 06.12.1939. It is further averred that the first defendant had forged a power of attorney deed
The court held that if a plaint shows no valid cause of action and is barred by limitation, it should be rejected to prevent misuse of legal process.
A suit filed after the statutory limitation period lacks a valid cause of action and must be dismissed without trial.
A suit filed to declare a sale deed null and void is barred by limitation if not filed within three years from the date of registration, and must disclose a valid cause of action.
The court held that the issue of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact, necessitating a full trial for resolution.
A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 for non-disclosure of cause of action and being barred by limitation if claims are based on prior known events.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to sue first accrues when the fact first comes to the knowledge of the plaintiff, and if a suit is filed beyond the limitation perio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
