M. R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI
C. S. Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
V. K. Senthil – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. SHAH, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in respective C.R.P. Nos. 1931, 1921, 1973, 1968, 1975, 1976 and 1922 of 2019 by which the High Court has dismissed the said civil revision petitions and has confirmed the orders passed by the learned Trial Court rejecting the applications filed under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) to reject the respective plaints filed by the appellant herein – original defendant, who has preferred the present appeals.
2. That the respondents herein – original plaintiffs have filed the respective suits before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the sale deed executed by the plaintiffs in favour of the appellant – original defendant as null and void and also to declare that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the suit schedule property and consequently restrain the defendant from in any manner alienating the suit schedule property.
2.1 Having been served with summons of the suit, the
Raghwendra Sharan Singh Vs. Ram Prasanna Singh (Dead) by Legal Representatives
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. Vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors.
Srihari Hanumandas Totala Vs. Hemant Vithal Kamat & Ors.
Ram Prakash Gupta Vs. Rajiv Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Salim D. Agboatwala & Ors. Vs. Shamalji Oddhavji Thakkar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.