Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S.KARIEL
Chamanji Ishwarji Thakore – Appellant
Versus
Collector Mehsana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's complaint of land grabbing and facts surrounding it. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction of special court and maintainability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observation on proper forum and remedies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. J.F. Mehta for the petitioner and learned AGP Mr. Jayneel Parikh for the respondent No.1.
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner challenges an order dated 14.08.2024 passed by the office of the Collector, Mehsana, intimating to the petitioner about decision taken by the Committee of consigning to file the application of the petitioner dated 03.04.2023 under the provisions of Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had preferred an application/complaint dated 03.04.2023 under the provisions of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 against the private respondents herein seeking action under the provisions of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 for encroaching/grabbing the land of the petitioner. It would appear that vide the impugned order, it has been informed to the petitioner that t
The High Court cannot entertain a writ petition regarding land grabbing when an efficacious alternative remedy exists under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, which necessitates adher....
Failure to consider a report from authorities does not invalidate a court's ruling if the decision is supported by substantial evidence presented during proceedings.
The court affirmed that possession without legal title constitutes land grabbing, rejecting the petitioners' claim of adverse possession due to lack of evidence.
It is well settled principle of law there is a presumption in favour of constitutionality of a statute. While deciding validity of a statute, it would be endeavour of court to find out the intention ....
Only aggrieved parties with a legitimate interest in the property can file applications under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982; third parties lack standing.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
