Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAULIK J.SHELAT
Late Dr Pravinbhai Hargovinddas Shah And Shailaben Pravinbhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
Late Jayendrabhai Hargovinddas And Late Saritaben Jayendrabhai Shah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional provision invocation and relief details. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties' arguments on the admissibility of wills. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on applicability of evidence act sections. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. analysis of section 90 and its inapplicability to wills. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final judgment and directions concerning the wills. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK J.SHELAT, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Ankur Oza waives service of notice of rule on behalf of contesting respondents. The presence of other respondents are not required. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, present application is taken up for final hearing.
2. Heard learned senior counsel Mr. Dhaval Dave with learned advocate Mr. Jigar Patel for the petitioners and learned advocate Mr. Ankur Oza for the contesting respondents.
3. The present application is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief :-
“A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of, or in the nature of, certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order date
Exhibiting Wills relies on witness testimony as dictated by Sections 63 and 68 of the Indian Evidence Act; Section 90's applicability is denied for Wills requiring attestation.
The presumption under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to Wills, necessitating proof of execution and attestation by the propounder.
Point of Law - Section 16 (c) of the Act of 1963 provides that specific performance of a contract cannot be enforced in favour of a person who fails to prove that he has performed or has always been ....
The presumption of execution and attestation of a 'WILL' over 30 years old can be drawn under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act if produced from proper custody.
A will must be proven in accordance with statutory requirements; the presumption for documents over 30 years old does not apply to wills under Indian law.
(1) Presumption contemplated under Section 90 of Indian Evidence Act in respect of documents more than 30 years old does not apply to a Will.(2) Second Appeal – Scope of interference in a Second Appe....
Probate is not mandatory for Wills executed outside the original civil jurisdiction of the specified High Courts. However, strict adherence to statutory proof requirements (attestation) is essential ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
