Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SA,CJ,DNR
TRIVEDI JANARDAN GHANSHYAMBHAI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in land acquisition (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. government notification implications (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. challenge to compensation receipt (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. court’s interpretation of the statutory provisions (Para 11 , 12 , 18) |
| 5. equality in compensation across enactments (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. constitutional arguments raised (Para 36 , 43 , 47) |
| 7. solatium and additional compensation principles (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. notification validity under rfctlarr (Para 70 , 73 , 76) |
| 9. final order and directions for compensation payment (Para 96 , 99 , 101) |
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J.
1. Heard Mr. Maulik G Nanavati, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Manvi Damle, learned advocates for the petitioners and Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior advocate assisted by Ms. Manisha Narsinghani, Ms.Parinaz V. Fanibanda, Mr. Rituraj Meena and Ms. Niyati Chauhan, learned advocates for the respondent no.2. Ms. Hetal Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for the State respondent no.1.
2. In this set of Writ petitions, the petitioners are the persons whose lands have been acquired by the Central Government under the provisions of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Ac
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
