IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SA,CJ,DNR
TRIVEDI JANARDAN GHANSHYAMBHAI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J.
1. Heard Mr. Maulik G Nanavati, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Manvi Damle, learned advocates for the petitioners and Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior advocate assisted by Ms. Manisha Narsinghani, Ms.Parinaz V. Fanibanda, Mr. Rituraj Meena and Ms. Niyati Chauhan, learned advocates for the respondent no.2. Ms. Hetal Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for the State respondent no.1.
2. In this set of Writ petitions, the petitioners are the persons whose lands have been acquired by the Central Government under the provisions of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (in short as the "Act, 1962") conferring the 'right of user' upon the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) namely respondent no.2.
3. The limited challenge in the Writ petitions to the validity and legality of the award passed in the year 2024 with respect to the lands belonging to different petitioners, determining compensation, is on the ground that the benefit of Solatium and additional compensation at the rate of 12% as payable under Section 30 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Reha
Union of India v. Tarsem Singh
National Highway Authorities of India v. P. Nagaraju
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vithal Rao
Union of India v. N. Murugesan
Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings (P) Ltd. v. O Liquidator
State of West Bengal. v. Anindya Sundar Das
Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav v. Union of India
P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Special Deputy Collector for Land Acquisition
Career Institute Educational Society Vs. Om Shree Thakurji Educational Society
C.N. Rudramurthy Vs. K. Barkathulla Khan and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.