Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Premkumar Hiraji Mahraji – Appellant
Versus
Dilipsinh Dasubha Jadeja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the accident and injuries. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments about appellant's income and compensation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent's defense and justification for assessment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's findings on income, disability, and compensation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. total compensation awarded to the appellant. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
Mool Chand Tyagi, J.
1. The captioned appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and award dated 14.10.2009 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Fastrack Court No. 2, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur, in M.A.C.P. No. 528 of 2003, whereby the learned Tribunal has partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a sum of Rs.2,35,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Only) along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization, as compensation.
2. The succinct facts as per the Claim Petition, which lead to the filing of the captioned appeal are summarized as under :-
i. On 05.01.2003, the appellant herein was travelling in the truck bearing Registration No. GJ-18-T-2091 as a conductor/cleaner. While returning to Jetalpur, the responde
Minimum wage standards must be considered for calculating compensation in personal injury cases, especially when assessing future loss of income due to permanent disabilities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
