IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Vinubhai Batukbhai Vagheliya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Gita Gopi, J.
1. The jail remarks shows that the accused had undergone six months and twenty three days of imprisonment, and a set-off of seven days was granted. The punishment was for six months and Rs.10,000/- fine and in failure of payment of fine, thirty days of further imprisonment. It appears that the accused could not pay the fine amount, thus had undergone the sentence as ordered.
2. The appeal is filed by the State under Section 377 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the order of the sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Amreli on 05.07.2004 in Sessions Case no.57 of 2004 challenging as insufficient sentence and praying for enhancing the sentence.
3. The respondent no.1 about 18 years was tried for the offence punishable under Sections 363 , 366 and 376 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (IPC). By the order dated 05.07.2004. The learned Sessions Judge was pleased to convict the accused under Section 363 IPC and sentenced him to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of fine, to further undergo fifteen days simple imprisonment. Further, the learned Sessions Judge was also pleased to convict
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
Bed Raj v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Mahadeo son of Kerba Maske v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana
Sentencing must reflect the seriousness of the crime, considering victim's age and guidelines for determining age, but leniency may apply in ambiguous cases.
The court modified the life imprisonment sentence to 18 years for rape, emphasizing the need to consider mitigating circumstances alongside the severity of the crime.
The court emphasized the importance of imposing appropriate, just, and proportionate sentences commensurate with the nature and gravity of the crime, considering the principles of proportionality, de....
Point of Law: “Friedman in his Law in Changing Society stated that: “State of criminal law continues to be - as it should be - a decisive reflection of social consciousness of society.” Therefore, i....
The court established that the benefit of doubt must favor the accused in cases of uncertain age and lack of corroborative evidence for sexual offences.
(1) Kidnapping, wrongful restraint and rape of girl child – Caste of accused is, per se, not a consideration for showing leniency in cases of such offences – Caste or religion of a litigant should ne....
Consent under threat is not valid in law. Victim's age must be determined by appropriate legal standards to ensure protection under the POCSO Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.