Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, L.S. PIRZADA
Amit Manibhai Panchal – Appellant
Versus
Kaivan M. Dastoor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court proceedings initiated regarding noise pollution compliance. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments address maintainability and supreme court directives. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court references supreme court directives on noise regulation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. supreme court directives binding under article 141. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. emerging obligations on state for noise regulation compliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. case adjourned for further address on implementation. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER :
1. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Senior Advocate Ms.Manisha Lavkumar Shah appearing with learned A.G.P. Mr.Chintan Dave for the respondent no.3 has pointed out the affidavit-in-rejoinder dated 11.09.2025 filed by the respondent No.3 - Gujarat Pollution Control Board, wherein a specific statement is made in paragraph No.3 that the orders and directions issued by this Court from time to time are required to be followed and complied with by the authorities and the deponent has always complied with all the directions. An issue with regard to the maintainability and entertainability of the present contempt proceedings is also raised. Learned Additional Advocate General has further pointed ou
Compliance with Supreme Court directives under Articles 141 and 142 is mandatory, and the failure to enforce noise pollution regulations warrants initiation of contempt proceedings, regardless of the....
The court clarified its inherent powers under Article 215 of the Constitution to punish for contempt and emphasized the continued applicability of the directions issued by the Apex Court in the cases....
![Jaago Nehru Nagar Residents Welfare Association ] Having Its Office At Shop No.5, Alaknanda Chs Ltd. Vs The Commissioner Of Police ] Having Office At Crawford Market - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 157](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Bombay_1.png)
The use of loudspeakers for religious purposes must comply with noise pollution regulations, as no religion permits disturbance to public peace, reinforcing the right to a peaceful environment under ....
The use of loudspeakers without permission violates noise pollution laws, infringing on the right to a peaceful environment protected under Article 21.
Contempt of court involves willful disobedience of court orders, which undermines judicial authority, emphasizing the need for compliance to maintain public confidence in the justice system.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
