Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C.DOSHI
Pirzada Saiyed Bahauddin B. Kadri (Since Decd.Thro Heirs) – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.C.DOSHI, J.
1. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) questions the legality and propriety of the judgment dated 23.12.2005 passed by the Joint District Judge & Fast Track Court No.12, Vadodara in Civil Appeal No.86 of 2004, by which the learned first appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2003 passed in Regular Civil Suit No.339 of 1986 and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
2. For the sake of brevity, parties are referred to as per their original status before the learned trial Court.
3. The factual aspects in a nutshell are as under:-
3.1 Plaintiff - Pirzada Saiyed Bahauddin B. Kadri filed suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat claiming relief to declare that notice dated 04.02.1996 issued by the Collector, Vadodara, bearing No.DEV/VASHI/328/86 as null and void, with the permanent injunction that the State Government may not restrain the plaintiff from carrying out religious and burial activities in the property of Danteshwar Hajira @Bada Hajira situated in land of Survey Nos.322/1 and 322/2 of Pratapnagar, Danteshwar, Vadodara (for sho
The appellate court ruled that reliance on unexhibited documents was improper, reaffirming the statutory restrictions on activities in protected areas and the necessity for proper evidence in substan....
Custom requires specific pleading and proof of continuity, certainty, long usage, reasonableness. Second appeals under Section 100 CPC permit no re-appreciation of evidence absent perversity. Fabrica....
There are two stages relating to documents. One is the stage when all the documents on which the parties rely are filed by them in Court. The next stage is when the documents are proved and formally ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the existence of the temple on the date of filing the suit was sufficient to establish its possession, and the defendants' right to assert tit....
The admissibility of public documents requires corroborative evidence to establish claims of familial relationships; civil suits challenging property mutations remain maintainable under specific prov....
The declaration of the Christian Cemetery as a Heritage site was illegal due to non-compliance with statutory procedures under the Assam Ancient Monuments and Records Act, 1959.
All contesting parties in suit must get fair opportunity to contest suit on merits in accordance with law.
A court may grant leave to institute a suit without notice under Section 80(2) CPC if urgent relief is necessary, and the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for local investigation is valid and ....
The Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not bar the determination of the religious character of a place of worship, which must be established through evidence in court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
