SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 73

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, ALOK AWASTHI, JJ.
Writ Petition No. 10497 of 2022
Hindu Front For Justice (Regd. Trust No. 976) Through Its President Ms. Ranjana Agnihotri & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
With
Kuldeep Tiwari  – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 10484 of 2022
With
Writ Petition No. 8986 of 2026
Salek Chand Jain  – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
With
Writ Petition No. 28334 of 2019
Maulana Kamaluddin Welfare Society Dhar Thr. Its President Abdul Samad Khan S/o Sirajuddin Khan  – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Mp & Ors. – Respondents
With
Writ Appeal No. 559 of 2026
Qazi Zakullah And Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
With
Writ Petition No. 6514 of 2013
Antar Singh & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
Decided On : 15-05-2026

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Shri Vishnu Shankar Jain - Advocate (through V.C.) with Shri Vinay Joshi, Ms. Varsha Parashar, Shri Harishankar Jain, Shri Parth Yadav, Shri Saurabh Singh, Ms. Mani Munjal Yadav, Shri Utkarsh Dubey, Shri Devendra Nagar, Shri Vagish Parashar, Shri Rohit Shukla, Ms.Shalini Joshi, Ms. Shivangee Parmar, Shri Satyanarayan Dubey, Ms. Priyanka Sharma, Shri Bhuvnesh Gupta, Shri Lalit Namdev, Shri Pradhumna Malpani, Shri Arpit Singh Parihar, Shri Rajesh Joshi and Ms.Pooja Verma.
For the respondent No.8:Shri Salman Khurshid – Sr. Advocate through VC with Shri Noor Ahmed Sheikh, Shri Zishan Khan, Ms.Lubna Naaz, Ms.Azra Rehman, Shri Tausif Warsi and Shri Arshad Mansuri – Advocates
For the interveners : Mohd. Farukh and Mohd. Munir :Shobha Menon – Senior Counsel with Shri N.A. Sheikh, Shri Mohd.Ikram Ansari and Shri Rahul Choubey – Advocates.
For the Respondent No.9:Shri Sunil Kumar Jain – Sr. Advocate and Addl. Solicitor General with Shri Aviral Vikas Khare, Shri Rishi Bhargava, Ms. Ayushi Agrawal, Ms.Nandini Sharma, Shri Kushagra Jain, Ms.Bhoomika Mev, Ms.Jyoti Sencha, Shri Sachin Patel and Ms.Ayush Agrawal - Advocates for respondent No.1 to 4 in WP No.10497/2022. Shri Vishwajit Joshi, Ms.Nena Mishra, Shri Shreesh Dubey, Ms. Surbhi Bahal, Ms.Ayushi Agrawal - Advocates.
For the interveners Jibran Ansari, Ayaz Qureshi and Firoz Sheikh :Shri Syed Ashhar Ali Warsi, Ms. Poorvi Asati, Ms.Manan Sharma, Shri Mohd. Hashim and Ms.Priyal Agrawal - Advocates
For respondent No.8 in WP No.10484/2022 & WP No.10497/2022:Shri Mohd Ikram Ansari – Advocate.
For the respondent/State:Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava, Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., and Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL.
For the respondent No.9:Ms.Nena Mishra and Ms. Surbhi Bahal – Advocates
Shri Manish Gupta, Shri Chandresh Gupta & Shri Sahaj Choudhary - Advocates for the petitioner
Shri Sunil Jain, Senior Advocate and Additional Solicitor General assisted by Shri Aviral Vikas Khare and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal – Advocates for the respondents Nos. 1 to 4.
Shobha Menon – Senior Counsel with Shri N.A. Sheikh, Shri Mohd.Ikram Ansari and Shri Rahul Choubey – Advocates for interveners Mohd. Farukh and Mohd. Munir.
Shri Noor Ahmed Sheikh, Shri Zishan Khan, Shri Tausif Warsi & Shri Arshad Mansuri – Advocates for the respondent No.8. Shri Mohd Ikram Ansari – Advocate for respondent No.8 in WP No.10484/2022 & WP No.10497/2022.
Shri Aniket Naik, learned counsel for the respondent No.9.
Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava, Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., and Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL for the respondent/State.
Shri Dinesh.P.Rajdhar - Advocate with Ms.Priya Jain and Shri Sulabh Samaiya for the petitioner.
Shri Sunil Kumar Jain - Addl. Solicitor General with Shri Aviral Vikas Khare and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal - Advocates for respondents No.1 to 6 & 10.
Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava - Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena - Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL for the respondent State.
Shri Noor Ahmed Sheikh, Shri Zishan Khan, Shri Tausif Warsi & Shri Arshad Mansuri – Advocates for the petitioner.
Shri Sunil Jain, - Senior Advocate and Additional Solicitor General assisted Shri Aviral Vikas Khare and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal – Advocates for the respondents No. 7, 8 & 10.
Shri Manish Gupta, Shri Chandresh Gupta and Shri Sahaj Choudhary – Advocates for the intervenor Kuldeep Tiwari.
Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava - Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena - Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL for the respondent State.
Ms.Shobha Menon – Sr.Advocate (through V.C.) assisted by Shri N.A. Sheikh, Shri Mohd. Ikram Ansari and Shri Rahul Choubey - Advocates for the appellants.
Shri Sunil Jain - Senior Advocate and Additional Solicitor General assisted Shri Aviral Vikas Khare and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal – Advocates for the respondents No.4 & 5.
Shri Manish Gupta, Shri Chandresh Gupta & Shri Sahaj Choudhary - Advocates for the intervenor Kuldeep Tiwari. Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava - Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena - Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL for the respondent State.
Shri.A.K. Chitale - Sr. Advocate with Shri Kartik Chitale - Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri Sunil Jain - Senior Advocate and Additional Solicitor General assisted by Shri Aviral Vikas Khare and Ms.Ayushi Agrawal – Advocates for the respondents No. 1, 2 & 6.
Shri Prashant Singh - Advocate General through VC with Shri Nilesh Yadav AAG, Shri Rahul Sethi - AAG, Shri Dhirendra S. Parmar - AAG, Shri Ashish Yadav - AAG, Shri Sonal Gupta - AAG, Shri Sudeep Bhargava - Dy.AG, Shri Shrey Raj Saxena - Dy.AG, Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Dy.AG and Shri Abhijeet Awasthy – Dy.AG, Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta and Shri Viraj Godha - G.A., Shri Sahil Sonkusale and Shri Viraj S. Jha - PL for the respondent State.

ORDER

Per: Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla

[1] The aforesaid petitions and appeal deal with the common issues, to the claim of prayer by hindus/namaz by muslims/prayer by Jain samaj in "disputed area" of Bhojshala and Kamal Maula Mosque situated at Dhar. In these petitions, a challenge has also been made to the order dated 7.4.2003 passed by Archaeological Survey of India to the extent to restrict the right of Hindus to worship in Bhojshala Complex "the disputed area" on a particular day and timings and also challenge to the order permitting the muslim community to offer namaz on Friday in the "disputed area" and in some petitions different reliefs are claimed in relation to the same "disputed area". Regard being had to the similitude of these petitions, they are being disposed of by the common order, however, the facts of each case and the arguments of learned counsel for parties are recorded separately.

WRIT PETITION NO.10497/2022

(HINDU FRONT FOR JUSTICE (REGD. TRUST NO.976) THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MS. RANJANA AGNIHOTRI & ORS.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2] The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-

"[i] Issue an appropriate writ, order, direction or declaration to the effect that only the members of Hindu Community have fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution of India to perform pooja and rituals at the place of Goddess Vagdevi/Maa Saraswati within the premises of ‘Saraswati Sadan’ commonly known as ‘Bhojshala’ situated at khasra land No.604 (Old No.313) within the city and District Dhar, State of Madhya Pradesh and the members of Muslim community have no right to use any portion of the aforesaid property for any religious purposes;

[ii] Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Government of India to create a Trust under the provisions of Trust Act, 1882 for the purposes of administration and management of the affairs of Bhojshala Temple and Sanskrit learning within the property in question at Land No.604 situated at Dhar town, District- Dhar and ASI be directed to continue to have overall administration and management of the property in accordance with the provisions of 1958 Act;

[iii] Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Trust (created by the Govt. of India in terms of prayer number (i) to re-establish the idol/Pratima of Goddess Saraswati and make provision for Darshan, Pooja and Worship of Goddess Saraswati and make proper management of Sanskrit learning in consonance with the Bhojshala as originally established; |

[iv] Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents from allowing the Muslims to perform prayer or worship in any manner within the temple complex i.e. property in question at Land No.604 at City and District Dhar;

[v] Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing para 1 of the order dated 07.04.2003 passed by Director, Archaeological Survey of India and also para 3 of the said order to the extent it restricts the right of Hindus to worship within Bhojshala complex i.e. the property in question at Land No.604 (old 313) in the city of District Dhar and direct that Hindus shall be permitted to perform Pooja daily without any restriction;

[vi] Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Government of India to undertake every effort to bring back the Pratima of Goddess Saraswati from London Museum in United Kingdom and re-establish the same within the ‘Saraswati Sadan’/Bhojshala complex situated at Khasra land No.604 (Old No.313) within the city and District Dhar, State of Madhya Pradesh;

[vii] Issue any other writ, order or direction in favour of the Petitioners as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and for which the Petitioners may be found entitled to;

[viii] Allow the Petition with costs;

[3] Learned counsel for petitioner Shri Vishnu Shankar Jain submitted that the present petition is not for claim of ownership on the disputed area of Bhojshala and Kama




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top