IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
Maisuria Mohanbhai Nanubhai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. N.R. Desai, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners.
2. By way of present petition, the petitioners herein are aggrieved by the impugned order dated 5.8.2023 passed by the respondent No.3 – Collector in Order No.3091/19/03/032/2023 as well as the order dated 28.4.2025 passed by the respondent No.1 in Revision Application No.MVV/BKP/VDD/02 of 2024 for grant of N.A. Use Permission, having prayed for the following reliefs:-
“(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 05.08.2023 passed by the respondent No.3- Collector in Order No. 3091/19/03/032/2023 (at ANNEXURE-A hereto) as well as order dated 28.04.2025 passed by the respondent-SSRD in Revision Application No.MVV/BKP/VDD/02 of 2024. at ANNEXURE-L hereto);
(B) During the pendency and final disposal of the present petition YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to stay further operation, implementation and execution of the impugned order dated 05.08.2023 passed by the respondent No.3-Collector in Order No. 3091/19/03/032/2023 (at ANNEXURE-A hereto) as well as
Party lacking interest in property cannot contest permissions granted for the property after selling it.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Collector's decision to reject the N.A permission application based solely on a pending Special Civil Application was not justified, and r....
The last contention regarding n on applicability of provisions of the Act to a land which is permitted to be converted into n on agricultural land by a competent Court also merits acceptance in light....
Authority under Gujarat Land Revenue Code cannot assess land title when considering applications for Non-Agricultural permission; the focus must remain on occupancy rights.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the validity of the order passed by the Mamlatdar and ALT in 1961 and its subsequent review, along with the statutory limita....
Point of law: When one examines the aspect of appeal preferred by the contesting respondents, one would find it difficult to accept as to how the right to appeal is said to have been conferred upon a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.