BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Lahoty Brothers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kalidas Ghosh – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. This revision application filed by the tenant/Defendant in the suit in question is directed against judgment and order passed by the appellate Court confirming the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court. Thus, this revision application being against the concurrent findings of fact towards decreeing the suit in favour of the landlord/opposite party, it is to be seen as to whether any interference is called for to such concurrent findings of fact exercising the revisional jurisdiction.
2. Adverting to the facts of the case, the opposite party herein as the Plaintiff filed the suit being Title Suit No. 82/01 before the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) No. 1, Silchar against the Defendant/Petitioner for eviction from the suit premises. The suit was filed for eviction of the Defendant/Petitioner from the suit premises on twin grounds of bonafide requirement of the suit premises and default in payment in monthly rent. According to the Plaintiff/opposite party the Defendant paid monthly rent to him @ Rs. 575/- upto the month of August 1996 and thereafter the Defendant/Petitioner neither paid any rent to the Plaintiff nor tendered the same for any month to the Def
Bhajraj Kunwarji Oil Mill and Gimming Factory v. Yorajsinha Shankarsinha Parihar AIR 1984 SC 1894
Chittaranjan Ghosh v. Abdur Rahman 1996 (2) GLT 102 Dwarka Prasad v. Niranjan (2003) 4 SCC 549
Manick Ch. Nandi v. Debdas Nandi AIR 1986 SC 446
Prativa Devi v. T.V Krishan (1996) 5 SCC 353
Ragavendra Kumar v. Firm Prem Machinery and Co. (2000) 1 SCC 679
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.