C.S.NAYUDU, S.K.DUTTA
Lawrence Singh Ingty – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Datta – Respondent
(1) In this Civil Rule the validity of the demand notices issued by the 1st respondent-Income-tax Officer, Shillong, on the petitioner, demanding payment of income-tax is questioned
(2) The main facts on which the petition is based are as follows: The petitioner is a member of one of the Scheduled Tribes in Assam belonging to Mikir Scheduled Tribe and permanently residing in the United Khasi and Jaintia Hills Autonomous District, which is included in Part A of the Table appended to paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India. He joined the State Government service in the year 1940 and had been serving the Government at various places including Naga Hills, Mizo Hills, Garo Hills, United Khasi-Jaintia Hills and other Districts in Assam The petitioner had served as the Deputy Commissioner of the Mizo Autonomous District, one of the autonomous districts forming part of Tribal Areas included in Part A of the Table to paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule. During the years 1958 to 1960 ho was Deputy Commissioner of the Mizo District at Aijal and thereafter served as Deputy Development Commissioner and Additional Secretary to the Government of Assam, Shillong in
(51) AIR 1951 SC 41 (V 38) 1950 SCK 86fl. Charanjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India 7
(51) AIR 1951 SC 318 (V 38) : 1951 SCR 682-. 52 Cri. LJ 1361. State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara 7
(52) AIR 1952 SC 75 (V 39) : 1952 SCR 281
(52) AIR 195-’ SC 235 (V 39) : 1952 SCR 710 1952 Cri. LJ 1167
53) AIR 1953 SC 156 (V 40) : 1953 SCR 589 : 1953 Cri. LJ 862
(53) AIR 1953 SC 287 (V 40) : 1953 SCR 661 1953 Cri. LJ 1158
(55) (S) AIR 1955 SC 191 (V 42): 1955-1 SCR 1045 : 1955 Cri. LJ 526
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.