SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Gau) 124

B.L.HANSARIA, T.C.DAS
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Motiram Ratanchand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Barthakur, P.Barthakur, P.P.Duara

Hansaria, J.-

A suit filed for realisation of a sum of Rs. 14.417.96 due to non-delivery of a consignment of 264 bags of wheat has been decreed by the learned Trial Court, though for Rs. 13,315.00 with proportionate cost. The consignment was booked from K.P. Dock, Calcutta on 5/8/66, and ought to have been delivered at Sibsagar by 5/9/66. As however, this was not done the suit as aforesaid was filed on 18/4/70. The booking of the consignment, and the non-delivery of the same are not in dispute. What has been agitated before this Court by the Defendant relates to issue No. 2 which was "whether the suit was maintainable". Though the issue relates to the general ground of maintainability, what has been urged in this regard is the question of limitation. The only other point urged by Shri Duara is about the quantum of relief granted.

2. In so far as the limitation is concerned there is no dispute that it is Article 11 of the limitation Act which is attracted, according to which a suit of the present nature is required to be filed within a period of 3 years from the date "the goods ought to be delivered". As even according to the plaintiff the goods ought to have been at Sibsagar by 5/9/6














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top