J.N.SARMA
Azharul Islam – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondent
2. The findings of the appellate authority are, inter alia as follows :
(i) The Anchalic Panchayat settled the bazar with prior approval of Mahakuma Parishad concerned and thus violated the procedure prescribed under the relevant rules meaning thereby, the Assam Panchayati Raj (Finance) Rules, 1990 vide Condition No.6 of the tender.
(ii) The Bazar Settlement Committee did not do wrong by rejecting the tenders of the tenderers at serial Nos. l, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 10.
(iii) As per the record of the comparative statement Md. Azaharul Islam to whom the Mahakuma Parishad recommended for settling the bazar does not appear to have submitted income tax clearance certificate and name of the Zamindar as required as per Condition No.29 of the tender notice.
(iv) The tender of Azaharul Islam was not a valid tender.
2A. Having arrived at this finding
Gullapalli Nageswara Rao vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
Ossein and Gelatine Manufacturers Association of India vs. Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd
Ramchandra Keshav Adke (dead) by Lrs vs. Govind Joti Chavare
Hukam Chand Shyam Lal vs. Union of India
Commissioner of Police, Bombay vs. Gordhandas Bhanji
Orient Paper Mills Ltd vs. Union of India
Orient Paper Mills Ltd vs. Union of India
The Purtabour Company Ltd vs. Cane Commissioner of Bihar
State of Punjab vs. Hori Krishna Sarma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.