2010 Supreme(Gau) 699
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
T.Nanda Kumar Singh, J.
Ghanashyam Vishwakarma, Gs-161752 Ovsr -Appellant
Versus
Director General, Border Roads Organization & Ors. -Resopndent
Writ Petition (C) No. 51 of 2009
Decided On : 10-09-2010
Advocate appeared for the Petitioner:Mr.A.R.Malhotra, Advocate appeared for the Respondents: Mr.S.N.Meitei
Headnote:
Recruitment Rules of 1996 - Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 - Section II - Constitution OF India, 1950 - Article 226 - Promotional post of Mason is Overseer - Trade test and completed qualifying service - Petitioner was initially appointed to post of Mason after being selected in Selection Test held in accordance with relevant Recruitment Rules next promotional post of Mason is Overseer - As per General Reserve Engineer Force Group C and D Recruitment Rules, 1982 post of Overseer is to be filled up by direct recruitment and balance by promotion from different posts including Mason who are matriculate with three years regular service in grade in GREF subject to passing of trade test - After joining post of Mason petitioner while in service with permission of respondents had passed his matriculation examination as well as Higher Secondary School Leaving Certificate Examination under Uttar Pradesh Education Board - Petitioner is a permanent resident of Village P. O. District Uttar Pradesh - Held, In Apex Court observed that purpose of power conferred in High Court Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India is to advance justice not to thwart it - Even when justice is by-product of an erroneous interpretation of law High Court ought not to wipe out such injustice in name of correcting error of law - Apex Court in Air India Statutory Corporation. Vs. United Labour Union & Ors Supreme held that founding fathers placed no limitation or fetters on power of High Court under Article 226 of Constitution except self imposed limitation - Arm of Court is long enough to reach injustice whenever it is found - In State of Maharashtra Vs. Apex Court held that power of High Court to be exercised under Article 226 of Constitution if it is discretionary its exercise must be judicious and reasonable admits of no controversy - No executive order could be issued in derogation of statutory rules far less a legislative Act - Rules being statutory in nature and having been framed under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Ordinance 1956 have statutory force executive order in question was required to be issued in consonance with and not in derogation thereof - Petition allowed
By this writ petition, the petitioner, who is a regular Overseer, is praying for a direction to the respondents to revise his pay scale at Rs. 5000-8000/- w.e.f. 1.1.1996 which is the revised pay scale for the post of Overseer as recommended by the 6th Central Pay Commission and accepted by the Government, i.e. the Government of India.
2. Heard Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.N. Meitei, learned counsel for the respondents.
THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
3. The petitioner was initially appointed to the post of Mason on 16.04.1985 after being selected in the Selection Test held in accordance with the relevant Recruitment Rules; the next promotional post of Mason is Overseer. As per the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF) Group 'C' and 'D' Recruitment Rules, 1982 the post of Overseer is to be filled up 10% by direct recruitment and balance 90% by promotion from different posts including Mason, who are matriculate with three years regular service in the grade in GREF subject to passing of trade test.
4. After joining the post of Mason, the petitioner while in service with the permission of the respondents had passed his matriculation examination as well as Higher Secondary School Leaving Certificate Examination under the Uttar Pradesh Education Board. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Village Durawadharampur, P. O. Mondh, District, Sant Ravidasnagar Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh.
5. The petitioner, after completing three years regular service, passed the trade test and promoted to the post of Overseer on 15.06.1990 on being selected by the DPC and since then he has been serving as regular Overseer. In the year 1996, the said GREF Group 'C' and 'D' Recruitment Rules, 1982 was partly amended under which methods of recruitment are 80% by direct recruitment and 20% by promotion; and essential technical qualification for direct recruitment to the post of Overseer is diploma in engineering. Out of 20% promotion quota, 50% of the vacancy is reserved for promotion to be filled up by promotion from amongst other Mason and Carpenters who have completed three years regular service and matriculate subject to passing of trade test. The said Recruitment Rules, 1996 is still in-force and petitioner is eligible under the said Recruitment Rules of 1996 for appointment by promotion to the post of Overseer inasmuch as he is matriculate and already passed trade test and completed qualifying service for promotion to the post of Overseer.
As stated above, the petitioner had already been promoted to the post of Overseer as early as 15.06.1990 i.e. long before the enforcement of the said Recruitment Rules of 1996.
6. The relevant portion of the said 6th Central Pay Commission i.e. para 7.39.22 is quoted hereunder:
"Border Roads Organization Overseer (Civil) 7.39.22. Higher pay scale has been demanded for the post of Overseer (Civil) in Border Roads Organization on the ground that the minimum qualification for the post is Diploma in Engineering. The post carries minimum direct recruitment qualification of Diploma in Engineering. These minimum qualifications had been prescribed in 1996. Fifth CPC, in their Report submitted in 1997, had recommended the scale of Rs. 5000-8000/- for all posts carrying minimum direct recruitment qualifications of Diploma in Engineering. This recommendation was accepted. The post should consequently have been extended the scale of Rs.5000-8000/-w.e.f. 1.1.1996. This was, however, not done. The Commission, accordingly, recommends that the post of Overseer may be upgraded and merged with their promotional post of Superintendent BR Grade II (present scale Rs.4500-8000. Since the Commission has recommended merger of the scales of Rs.5000-8000/-, Rs. 5500-9000/-and Rs. 6500-10500, the post will be placed in the revised Pay Band PB-2 of Rs. 8700-34800/-along with a grade pay of Rs. 4200/-. Commission also advises the Government to implement this retrospectively from 1.1.1996