IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Manash Ranjan Pathak, Songkhupchung Serto, JJ.
Fatema Khatun - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Assam And Others - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 295 of 2015
Decided On : 28-06-2019
Indian Penal Code – Sections 148,149,323,302 – Criminal Procedure Code – Section 357 – Unlawful Assembly Issue – Whether the accused persons were being the members of an unlawful assembly committed offence of rioting with deadly weapon in prosecution of the common object of such unlawful assembly – Whether the accused persons were being the members of an unlawful assembly voluntarily caused hurt to Samir Ali in prosecution of the common object of such unlawful assembly – Whether the accused persons being the members of an unlawful assembly committed murder by intentionally causing death of Samir Ali in prosecution of the common object of such unlawful assembly – Held, court sentenced the accused persons to simple imprisonment for a period of 2 years for having committed the offence punishable and court also sentenced them to imprisonment for a period of 7 years and a fine each of Rs. 5000/-for having committed the offence punishable and to a further imprisonment of another 6 months in case of default in payment of the fine amounts – All the terms of the sentences will run concurrently – The respondent Nos. 2 to 8 shall surrender before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Nagaon forthwith in connection with the Sessions Case arising out of G R Case to serve the sentence – Considering the provisions and the Notification of the Political (A) Department, Government of Assam court direct the Government of Assam to pay Rs.5,00,000/- by Account Payee-Draft in any Nationalised Bank of India as victim compensation to the appellant Fatema Khatun, wife of the deceased victim Samir Ali through the State Legal Services Authority, Assam and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Nagaon on her proper identification – Order Accordingly
JUDGMENT :
S. Serto, J.
This is a criminal appeal directed against the judgment & order dated 03.08.2015, passed by the learned Addl. Session Judge (FTC), Nagaon in Session's Case No. 287(N)/2003, wherein the accused persons except one of them were acquitted of the charges under section 148/149/323/302 IPC.
The appellant is the wife of the victim/deceased.
2. Heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. B.Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P on behalf of the State of Assam and Mr. D.K. Medhi, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 8.
3. The facts which led to the filing of this appeal are as follows;
On 28.11.2000, at 2:00 P.M, one Md. Mamit Ali, lodged an ejahar to the Officer-in Charge of Rupohihat Police Station, stating that at about 1:00 P.M. of that day, Md. Sukur Ali, Md. Sorhab Ali, Ali Akbar, Abdul Hekim, Abdul Mannaf, Idris Ali, Nur Islam, Nurul Hoque and Saidur Islam, having previous grudge, assaulted his uncles namely, Md. Samir Ali, Jamir Ali, Mafiz Ali and Siddique Ali, on PWD road in front of his house causing thereby grievous injuries, therefore, investigation may be conducted and necessary action may also be taken.
On received of the same, FIR Case No. 98/2000, under section 147/148/325 of IPC, was registered against the persons named by the complainant. Later in the day, one of the persons who was stated to have been assaulted by the accused persons namely, Samir Ali died due to the injuries suffered as such, after the investigation was over, charge sheet was submitted under section 147/148/149/323/302 IPC, in the Court of the learned CJM, Nagaon. Since, the case was triable by the Sessions Court, the learned CJM committed the same to the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Nagaon. The learned Sessions Judge, made over the same to the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC), Nagaon for trial. After all the formalities were completed, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, (FTC), Nagaon framed the following charges against the accused persons;
"(1) Name of the office of Magistrate etc. I (i) Sri. M.N. Laskar, Addl. Dist. & Session Judge, (Adhoc) Nagaon, Assam
(2) Name of the accused person hereby charge you as follows;
(i) Sukur Ali (2) Surhab Ali (3) Ali Akbar (4) Abdul Hakim (5) Abdul Mannab (6) Idrish Ali (7) Nurul Islam (8) Noor Mahmood (9) Saidur Islam
First: - That you, on or about the on 28.11.2000 at about 1 P.M. at Public road at Lawgaon you committed rioting by deadly weapon
(3) : My cognizance or the cognizance of the Court of Session; and hereby committed an offence punishable under 148 IPC of section the Indian Penal Code, and withins my cognizance.
Secondly:- That you, on or about the same day, time and place you voluntarily caused hurt to Samir Ali in furtherance of common object of all.
and thereby committed an office punishable under 323/149 of IPC section the Indian Penal Code, and withins my cognizance
Thirdly;- That you, on or about the same day and time you caused hurt to Samir Ali who died after 2 days and you caused hurt intentionally for causing death and did murder for furtherance of common object of all.
(4) In cases tried by Magistrate omit "by the said Court"; and thereby committed an offence punishable under 302/149 IPC section the Indian Penal Code, and withins my cognizance.
and hereby direct that you be trieds by this Court on the said Charge. Charge is framed, read over and explained to them to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
Dated this 5th day of 19th Nov'2003 Magistrate."
4. In the impugned judgment, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC), Nagaon framed three points for determination. They are as follows (reproduced verbatim);
"Now points for determination are as follows;
(i) Whether the accused persons were being the members of an unlawful assembly committed offence of rioting with deadly weapon in prosecution of the common object of such unlawful assembly?
(ii) Whether the accused persons were being the members of an unlawful assembly voluntarily caused hurt to Sa
Allarakha K. Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat
Chandrappa and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Harbans Kaur and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana
K. Gopal Reddy Vs. State of A.P
Kamaljit Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Khurshid Ahmed Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Ramaphupala Reddy Vs. State of A.P
Ramesh Babulal Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat
Solanki Chimanbhai Ukabhai Vs. State of Gujarat
State of U.P. Vs. Krishna Gopal
Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta (Dr.) and Other vrs. State of Maharashtra
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.