JUDGMENT :

The supervisory jurisdiction of this Court conferred by Article 227 of the Constitution of

India is sought to be invoked whereby a challenge has been made to an order dated 24.11.2016 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati (DRT) in IA/33/2016 arising out of OA No.216/20216.

2. By the impugned order, the learned DRT has appointed one Shri Saikat Mukherjee, respondent no.2 as the Receiver to take possession of the immovable as well as the movable properties which are the subject matter of the recovery proceedings instituted by the respondent no. 1-Bank before the DRT.

3. Before going to the issue which calls for determination, the facts of the case are required to be stated in brief.

4. The initial petitioner was one Smti. Aruna Sharma and the respondents were the applicant-Bank (respondent no.1), the Receiver appointed (respondent no. 2) and the company which had taken the loan (respondent no. 3). However, it appears that after filing of the present revision petition, vide an order dated 19.05.2017 passed in IA(C)/1617/2017, respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 have been impleaded. The said respondents are, Shri Pranjal Kumar Sharma (respondent no. 4), Shri Himadri Sharm