IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.
Rabindra Nath Patangia his Legal Heir Bina Patangia - Petitioner
Versus
State of Assam and Others - Respondent
WP(C) No. 6212 of 2014
Decided on : 24-02-2021
Pensionary Benefits - Provincialisation of Secondary Schools - Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977 - Section 3
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, as the legal heir of a deceased employee, claimed pensionary benefits for the services rendered. The deceased was suspended in 1974 and remained so until his superannuation in 2011. The school where he worked was provincialized under the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the deceased employee, by operation of law under section 3 of the Act of 1977, became an employee of the Government of Assam. As the departmental proceeding against him was not completed and no penalty was imposed, he was entitled to pensionary benefits. The legal right of the petitioner as the legal heir subsisted, and the court directed the authorities to process the pension papers for the family pension.
Issues: Claim for pensionary benefits, effect of provincialisation under the Act of 1977, entitlement of legal heir to family pension.
Ratio Decidendi: The deceased employee, upon provincialisation of the school, became an employee of the Government of Assam. The failure to complete the departmental proceeding meant that he was entitled to pensionary benefits, and the legal right of the petitioner as the legal heir subsisted.
Final Decision: The court directed the authorities to process the pension papers for the family pension of the deceased employee and ordered the Director of Pension to proceed as per law.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. R.C. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the Secondary Education Department.
2. Notice had been served on the respondent No. 4 being the Principal of Tezpur Academy Higher Secondary School, Tezpur. But none appears for the respondent No. 4. Considering it is a matter of 2014, we deem it appropriate to proceed with the hearing of the matter in the absence of the respondent No. 4.
3. We have taken noteiof that the petition was instituted by Rabindra Nath Patangia claiming pensionary benefits for the services he had rendered during his service period. Rabindra Nath Patangia died on 8.11.2019 and on his death the present petitioner-Smt. Bina Patangia has been substituted, being the legal heir of deceased Rabindra Nath Patangia. As it is a claim for pensionary benefit, the right to sue and to be sued of the deceased Rabindra Nath Patangia survived and, therefore, we now take up the writ petition on behalf of Smt. Bina Patangia who is the legal heir of the deceased Rabindra Nath Patangia.
4. Rabindra Nath Patangia was appointed as a Lower Division Assistant in the respondent Tezpur Academy Higher Secondary School, Tezpur in the year 1970 and he was promoted as UDA in the year 1974. On an allegation of misappropriation of an amount of Rs. 1250, an FIR was lodged against the deceased by the Tezpur Academy Higher Secondary School, Tezpur in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tezpur under section 488/477A, IPC. In the trial, Rabindra Nath Patangia was sentenced to under simple imprisonment of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 for the offence under section 408 and a further simple imprisonment of 6 months and a fine of Rs. 300 in the default thereof for the offence under section 477A. On an appeal being carried before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonitpur, the conviction was retained but the sentence were interfered. Be that as it may, in connection with the said alleged offence against the Rabindra Nath Patangia, he was also placed under suspension in the year 1974. The deceased Rabindra Nath Patangia continued to remain suspended for the entire period of his service career till his date of superannuation on 31.1.2011. We also take note of that in the year 1974 when the deceased Rabindra Nath Patangia was placed under suspension, the respondent No. 4 was at that relevant point of time an institute under the deficit-grants-in-aid.
5. The Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977 (in short Act of 1977) was enacted providing for provincialisation of secondary education covered by the deficit scheme of the Government of Assam. The respondent No. 4 being a school under the deficit scheme of the Government of Assam also stood provincialized by the Act of 1977, which received the assent of the Governor on 12.10.1977 and came into force from 1.10.1977. The implication of the Act of 1977 in respect of the respondent No. 4 school was that the said school was provincialised w.e.f. 1.10.1977. Section 3 of the Act of 1977 is extracted as below:
(1) All rules including service rules and rules of conducts and discipline which are applicable to Government servant of corresponding ranks shall be applicable to all employees;
(2) All employees shall get such emoluments as salary and allowances as may be prescribed:
Provided that no employee shall get as emoluments any amount which is less than the amount he was getting immediately before the appointed day.
(3) Services of all the employees shall be encadred in appropriate cadres in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government for this purpose.
(4) The i
The provincialisation of a school under the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977 has legal implications on the employment status of the school's employees, and failure to complete ....
The entitlement to pensionary benefits under the Assam Service Pension Rules, 1969 and other relevant laws is upheld even if an employee was under suspension and the departmental proceeding against h....
The court affirmed that an employee appointed before the New Pension Scheme is entitled to benefits under the Old Pension Scheme, regardless of any undertaking given under duress.
Family pension cannot be granted if the deceased was not in government service at the time of death, as per applicable pension rules.
The State cannot benefit from its own wrong, and an employee, after rendering service for the complete career and upon attaining the age of superannuation, is entitled to pension.
The court affirmed that the provisions for family pensions apply retroactively to deceased employees if conditions are fulfilled, reflecting principles of equity and social justice.
The court established that pension eligibility is based on total service duration from initial appointment, not just provincialized service.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.