Saurav Jyoti Parasor, S/o Mr. Hiranya Kumar Goswami vs State Of Assam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Gau) 160

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Saurav Jyoti Parasor, S/o Mr. Hiranya Kumar Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. D. Das, Mr. R. Sarma, Mr. D.K. Mishra, Ms. D. Saikia, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. D. Saikia, Mr. P. Nayak, Mr. T.J. Mahanta, Mr. P.P. Dutta, Mr. A.K. Sarma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. By an Advertisement dated 14.08.2018, published by the Public Works Department [PWD], Government of Assam, applications were invited for filling up 156 nos. of posts of Assistant Engineers [Civil] in the Public Works Department under Regulation 3[f] of the Assam Public Service Commission [Limitation of Functions] Regulations, 1951 [‘the APSC Regulations, 1951’, for short] in the Pay Scale of Rs. 30,000 -Rs. 1,10,000 with Pay Band : Rs. 12,700.

1.1. By another Advertisement, also dated 14.08.2018, published by the Public Works Department [PWD], Government of Assam, applications were invited for filling up 307 nos. of posts of Junior Engineer [Civil] in the Public Works Department under Regulation 3[f] of the APSC Regulations, 1951 in the Pay Scale of Rs. 14,000 - Rs. 49,000 with Pay Band : Rs. 8,700.

2. It was indicated in both the advertisements that the appointments would be purely on ad-hoc basis for a period of 4 [four] months and the details of the same could be seen in the concerned website. A common brief Advertisement dated 14.08.2018 was published.

3. As per t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Gau) 160

MANISH CHOUDHURYSaurav Jyoti Parasor, S/o Mr. Hiranya Kumar Goswami – AppellantVersusState Of Assam – Respondent

Cases Referred (22)

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Saurav Jyoti Parasor, S/o Mr. Hiranya Kumar Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent