SUMAN SHYAM, MALASRI NANDI
GOBIND SINGHAL S/O- SHRI RADHESHYAM SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE P. P. , ASSAM – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
Suman Shyam, J.
Heard Dr. Y. M. Choudhury assisted by Mr. D. K. Bhattacharyya and Ms. R. Gonsalvez, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State. Ms. R. D. Mazumdar, learned Legal Aid Counsel is present on behalf of the informant.
1. By the impugned judgment dated 30.07.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in Sessions Case No.69/2018 the three appellants viz., Gobind Singhal (A-1), Kamali Devi Singhal (A-2) and Bhabani Singhal (A-3) were convicted under Sections 120(B)/201/302 of the Indian Penal Code for committing the murder of deceased Sweta Agarwal based on a conspiracy hatched by them and also for destroying evidence. The A-1 Gobind Singhal, who is the appellant in Crl. Appeal No.350/2019, was awarded death sentence for committing the offence under section 302 IPC and also to pay fine of Rs 10,000/-. Death Sentence Reference No.3/2019 has been preferred by the State for confirmation of the death sentence. The A-1 has also been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs 5000/-for committing the offence under section 120-B of the IPC and a
Paramjeet Singh vs. State Uttarakhand reported in (2010) 10 SCC 439
Nar Singh vs. State of Haryana reported in (2015) 1 SCC 496
Reena Hazarika vs. State of Assam reported in AIR 2018 SC 5361
Md. Sahid Khan vs. State of Assam
Paramjeet Singh @Pamma vs. State of Uttarkhand (2010) 10 SCC 439
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.