NELSON SAILO
Lalrempuii Fanai D/o F. Pahnuna – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NELSON SAILO, J.
1. Heard Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Also heard Mr. J.C. Lalnunsanga, learned Standing counsel, MPSC for respondent No. 3.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 30.08.2013 (Annexure-24), by which the disciplinary authority in exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 12 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 imposed upon her a major penalty of reduction to lower rank and Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/- per month under Rule 11(vi) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 for a period of 3 years with cumulative effect while restricting her pay to the amount of subsistence allowance drawn during the suspension period.
3. Brief facts of the case essential for disposal of the instant writ petition is that the petitioner who is a State Civil servant and posted as the Director, SIRD, Kolasib at the relevant time was placed under suspension with immediate effect vide Order dated 27.11.2009 (Annexure-1) pending drawal of the departmental proceeding against her. Following this, a Mem
B.C. Chaturvedi vs. Union of India and Others
Basab Bijoy Bhattacharjee vs. Gauhati High Court and Others
Depot Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Mohd. Yousuf Miya and Others
Deputy General Manager (Appellate Authority) and Others vs. Ajai Kumar Srivastava
ECIL vs. B. Karunakar (Constitution Bench)
Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. S.S. Sheokand
P.V. Srinivasa Sastry and Others vs. Comptroller and Auditor General and Others
Union of India vs. S.K. Kapoor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.