SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 657

Forhana Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Khan
For the Respondent: Mr. A. Phukan and Ms. D.D. Barman

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 being the authorities under the Elementary Education Department of the Govt. of Assam and Ms. D.D. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj.

2. The petitioner is a teacher in the Kalartook Mothshojibi VLP School, Karimganj having been appointed on 25.4.2007., One of the teachers, namely, Ahmed Banaiamia had been provincialised under the Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011 (‘Act of 2011’)-As the services of the petitioner was not provincialised along with other teachers, this petition is instituted.

3. Mr. A. Phukan, learned counsel for the Elementary Education Department raises a preliminary objection that the daim of the petitioner for provincialisation is not maintainable inasmuch as, the other teacher was provincialised under the Ad of 2011 and as the said Ad had in the meantime been declared to be ultra vires by the judgment dated 23.9.2016 in WP(C) No. 3190/2012, therefore, no further provincialisation is maintainable. We appreciate the contention raised by Mr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top