IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Songkhupchung Serto, J.
Ashyut Kalita - Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 3522 Of 2019
Decided On : 13-04-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 –Assam Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1964 – Rule-15 – Power of high court to issue certain writs – Order personnel entrusted with the job mentioned above were directed to work under supervision, Head Assistant of unit and they were also given responsibility of scrutinizing bank account numbers and bill amounts of personnel including those who have retired from service or transferred from unit or expired etc – Held, Court also referred to case came to conclusion that principles followed in those two cases would also apply in that case and held that action of Disciplinary Authority in imposing a comparatively lighter punishment on co-delinquent while imposing harsher punishment on appellant cannot be permitted in law since they were all involved in same incident – Accordingly, punishment of dismissal from service imposed on appellant was set aside and his reinstatement forthwith was directed – Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Songkhupchung Serto, J.
1. Heard Mr. U.K. Nair, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard Mr. D. Doley, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents.
2. While the petitioner was posted at 8th Assam Police Battalion situated at Abhayapuri as ABSI, the respondent No. 4 who was the Commandant of the Battalion, issued an order vide Memo No. Bn.8/Acctt/2014/563-66, dated 26.03.2014 by which 8 (eight) personnel of the battalion including the petitioner were entrusted with the job of preparing the pending D.A arrear bills of the personnel of the battalion for the period 01.01.1998 to 31.05.2001 and 01.07.2002 to 31.05.2005 for which sanctioned was accorded by the Government vide order No. HMA.2/2014/16-A, dated 05.03.2014. As per the order the personnel entrusted with the job mentioned above were directed to work under the supervision of one Sri. Rasaraj Bhattacharjee, Head Assistant of the unit and they were also given the responsibility of scrutinizing the bank account numbers and bill amounts of the personnel including those who have retired from service or transferred from the unit or expired etc.
3. When the process for preparing and disbursement of the arrears of the D.A was going on the Commandant of the Battalion (respondent No. 4) received a complaint on 23.04.2014 which alleged that there was misappropriation of the D.A arrears. Based on the information he issued an order dated 28.04.2014 by which the petitioner and all his colleagues who were entrusted with the responsibilities mentioned above were placed under suspension. After the suspension order was issued the Commandant issued a show cause notice dated 08.08.2014 along with statement of allegations to all of them. In the show cause notice they were also asked to submit their written statements. The charge against the petitioner was as follows;
(2) Again, the Government sanction order against the above estimated bills received by this office on 11.03.2014 but put up the same before the Commandant on 25.03.2014. Hence, you along with others whose names are given above intentionally delayed the matter to grab the D.A Arrear amounts of the person who have either died, retired or transferred from this Battalion or those force personal who had died during service or after retirement.
(3) Moreover, in spite of repeated instruction from this office to collect the bank account numbers of the eligible force personnel of DA Arrear, whose bank account numbers are not available in the office records, you have not sent a single WT Message to the concerned Officers, intentionally so that you along with other to succeed in your evil intention.
(4) Before submission of final bill to the Treasury the undersigned has directed (i) Head Assistant Shri. Rasaraj Bhattarcharjee (U/S) (ii) Shri Suresh Ray (U/S), Sr. Assistant and you to verify the Bank account numbers of the personnel of 8th A.P. Battalion from the records, the bank account of force personnel who have been transferred/retired from this unit from their concerned offices and put up before the undersigned. Shri Suresh Ray (U/S), Sr. Assistant signed each page of the Bank list as verified. After that, a team lead by you entered into a conspiracy to grab the Government money and manipulated documents signed by me including soft copies (C.D) which was dispatched to the Abhayapuri Sub-Treasury and State Bank of India
The court emphasized the principle of parity in punishment, ruling that disproportionate penalties among co-delinquents violate principles of equality and natural justice.
Negligence without dishonest intent should not warrant dismissal; punishment must be proportionate to the misconduct.
Court cannot decide on the quantum of punishment to be awarded. This power exclusively lies with the appointing authority.
The court emphasized that it would be unjust, unfair, and oppressive to allow the findings in the departmental proceedings to stand when the case against the petitioner could not be established in a ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.