R. M. CHHAYA, SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Sudipta Nath, S/o. Late Indreswar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Mrinalini Sarkar, W/o. Shri Sudipta Nath – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.M. Chhaya, J.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment dated 03.12.2018 and decree dated 15.12.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court No.II, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in F.C. (Civil) Case No.618/2015, the original petitioner/appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
2. The following facts emerge from the record of the appeal.
The marriage between the appellant/husband and the respondent/wife was solemnized on 08.02.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals at Chakitup, Nagaon. It is the case of the appellant that after the marriage both of them stayed at the residence of the appellant and attempted to cohabitate. It is the case of the appellant that the respondent refused to cohabitate with him and that instead of giving birth to a child, the respondent often suggested the appellant to adopt a child. The appellant also alleged that the respondent misbehaved with the parents of the appellant. It is further the case of the appellant that the parents of the respondent were also informed about the behaviour of the respondent and ultimately without permission of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.