Back
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Dyna Roof Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Purshottam Gaggar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Dr. Ashok Saraf learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury learned senior counsel and Mr. S. Chamaria learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, who is the Resolution Professional representing the Corporate Debtor, RSH Agro Products Limited and Mr. S. Dutta learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 Punjab National Bank, Mr. M. Sarma learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 HDFC Bank. None appears for the respondent no. 4 IIFL Finance Limited and proforma respondent no. 5 Kamal Kumar Harlalka.
2. The petitioner no. 1 namely Dyna Roof Private Limited is a private limited company having its registered office at 10th Mile at Mawsmai Village in the Ribhoi district of Meghalaya and is represented by its Director Saurabh Agarwal, whereas the petitioner no. 2 Rohin Kumar Hansaria is the proprietor of a firm namely Steel Sales Corporation having its office at S J Road at Athgaon in Guwahati. Both the petitioners are unsecured financial creditors of the Corporate Debtor RSH Agro Products Limited.
3. At the instance of the Corporate Debtor RSH Agro Products Limited, an insolvency proceeding was initiated under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankrup
The main legal principle established is that the provisions of Section 12 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are mandatory, and any extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process s....
PIRP extendable beyond 180-day moratorium limit under Section 101 IBC, which cannot be extended; Regulation 19 timelines directory, enabling adjudication of creditor-approved repayment plans.
Extensions of time for insolvency resolution beyond statutory limits can be granted when stakeholder interests justify such measures, reaffirming the primary aim of resolution over liquidation.
The court emphasized that stakeholder interests must guide extensions of the insolvency resolution process timelines under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The court clarified that 'extension' of time in insolvency proceedings does not equate to 'exclusion' of time, establishing that consolidation of related company petitions is not a recognized process....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
