Back
ROBIN PHUKAN
Singta Techi Tara S/o Shri Tabing Techi Tara – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Legality, propriety and correctness of order dated 10.05.2021, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seppa in Seppa P.S. Case No. 34/12, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 37/12, registered under Section 420/468 IPC, is put to challenge in this revision petition, under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. 1973, by the petitioner- Shri Singta Techi Tara.
2. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seppa, has summoned the petitioner-Singta Techi Tara, as an accused to stand trial along with rest of the accused under Section 420/468 of the IPC.
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly state as under:
The judgment emphasizes that invoking Section 319 Cr.P.C. requires evidence that, if unrebutted, would lead to conviction, and the court should refrain from exercising this power without such satisfa....
The discretionary nature of Section 319 Cr.P.C., the requirement of stronger evidence than mere probability of complicity, and the court's active role in eliciting necessary materials and finding the....
The discretion to invoke the power under Section 319 of CrPC is to be exercised sparingly and only in cases where strong and cogent evidence warrants such action. The individual act of the accused sh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
